Coordinate conjugate to momentum.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between coordinate transformations and momentum transformations in classical mechanics, specifically using Lagrangian mechanics. The transformation from coordinates \( x \) to \( y \) is defined as \( x \longmapsto y \), leading to a new Lagrangian \( M[y,\dot y] \) and a corresponding momentum \( q \). The main inquiry is how to reverse this process, transforming momenta \( p \) to \( q \) and finding the corresponding coordinate transformation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of canonical transformations and suggests reviewing generating functions for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with momentum definitions in classical physics
  • Knowledge of canonical transformations
  • Basic grasp of generating functions in mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study canonical transformations in detail
  • Learn about generating functions and their applications
  • Explore the mathematical framework of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Review examples of coordinate transformations in classical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, as well as researchers interested in advanced topics related to Lagrangian dynamics and transformations.

Petr Mugver
Messages
279
Reaction score
0
Let's take a system, for simplicity with only one degree of freedom, described by a certain lagrangian

[tex]L[x,\dot x][/tex]

I define the momentum

[tex]p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial\dot x}[/tex]

Now, if I make a change of coordinates

[tex]x\longmapsto y\qquad\qquad\qquad(1)[/tex]

I obtain a second lagrangian

[tex]M[y,\dot y]=L[x(y(t)),\partial_t x(y(t))][/tex]

and I can define a second momentum

[tex]q=\frac{\partial M}{\partial\dot y}[/tex]

My question is, if instead of the transformation (1) I want to consider the transformation of the momenta

[tex]p\longmapsto q\qquad\qquad\qquad(2)[/tex]

How can I find the corresponding transformation (1)? In other words, given that I know how to do (1)-->(2), how can I do (2)-->(1)?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you need to read some material about canonical transformations.
Maybe wiki is a good start:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_transformation

Once you are on the starting block, read about generating functions.
The last section "Modern mathematical description" is like a summary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
570
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K