Graduate Coord Transf. in Linearized GR: Understanding Metric Transformation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the relationship between coordinate transformations and metric transformations in linearized General Relativity (GR). A specific coordinate transformation is given by tilde coordinates, which leads to a transformation of the metric tensor. The Lie derivative of the metric is defined and used to derive the metric transformation from the coordinate transformation. It is emphasized that the metric transformation can be obtained by substituting the new coordinates into the transformation law and expanding to first order in the small parameter epsilon. The conversation concludes with a clarification that the derivation of the Lie derivative follows from the definition rather than being a starting point.
Woolyabyss
Messages
142
Reaction score
1
I was studying linearized GR where we make the following coordinate transformation ## \tilde{x}^{a} = x^{a} + \epsilon y^{a}(x) ##

This coordinate transformation is then meant to imply ## g_{ab}(x) = \tilde{g}_{ab}(x) + \epsilon \mathcal{L}_{Y} g_{ab} ##

Would anyone be kind enough to explain to me how the metric transformation is gotten from the coordinate transformation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To some extent, this is how the Lie derivative of the metric is defined. The Lie derivative is given by
$$
\mathcal L_Y g = \lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left[\frac{1}{\epsilon}(\gamma_{Y}(\epsilon)^* g - g)\right],
$$
where ##\gamma_Y(\epsilon)## is the flow of the vector field ##Y## for a parameter distance ##\epsilon##. If you write this out in coordinates, you will get exactly your given relation.

(Note that ##f^*g## is the pullback of ##g## under the diffeomorphism ##f##.)
 
Noticing that the Lie Derivative for the metric is ##(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}##
you can write down the metric in ##x+ \epsilon \xi## $$g_{ab} (x+ \epsilon \xi) d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^a d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^b = (g_{ab} + \epsilon (g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}))dx^a dx^b + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2) \approx (g_{ab} + \epsilon (\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab}) dx^a dx^b$$
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Woolyabyss
kent davidge said:
Noticing that the Lie Derivative for the metric is ##(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}##
you can write down the metric in ##x+ \epsilon \xi## $$g_{ab} (x+ \epsilon \xi) d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^a d(x+ \epsilon \xi)^b = (g_{ab} + \epsilon (g_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + g_{bc} \xi^c_{,a}))dx^a dx^b + \mathcal O (\epsilon^2) \approx (g_{ab} + \epsilon (\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab}) dx^a dx^b$$
This is a bit of a backwards argument. The definition of the Lie derivative is that given in #2. Based on that definition, you can derive ##(\mathcal L_\xi T)_{ab} = T_{ac} \xi^c_{,b} + T_{cb} \xi^c_{,a} + \xi^c T_{ab,c}## for an arbitrary type (0,2) tensor field ##T##. Now, if you have the Levi-Civita connection, then ##\nabla_\xi g = 0## and you would have
$$
(\mathcal L_\xi g)_{ab} = g_{ac} \xi^c_{;b} + g_{cb} \xi^c_{;a}.
$$
Note that you get some Christoffel symbols out of ##\xi^c g_{ab,c}## that turn the derivatives of the ##\xi## into covariant derivatives. Thus, you get the expression you started with from applying the definition of the Lie derivative, not the other way around.
 
  • Like
Likes Woolyabyss
Much appreciated guys. I understand now thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes kent davidge
Woolyabyss said:
I was studying linearized GR where we make the following coordinate transformation ## \tilde{x}^{a} = x^{a} + \epsilon y^{a}(x) ##

This coordinate transformation is then meant to imply ## g_{ab}(x) = \tilde{g}_{ab}(x) + \epsilon \mathcal{L}_{Y} g_{ab} ##

Would anyone be kind enough to explain to me how the metric transformation is gotten from the coordinate transformation?
Just substitute \bar{x} = x + \epsilon Y in the transformation law of the metric tensor and expand to first order in \epsilon. It is more convenient to work with the inverted transformation g_{ab}(x) = \frac{\partial \bar{x}^{c}}{\partial x^{a}}\frac{\partial \bar{x}^{d}}{\partial x^{b}} \bar{g}_{cd}(\bar{x}) . Keep in mind that infinitesimal transformation means that \bar{g}_{ab} = g_{ab} + \mathcal{O}(\epsilon). Therefore, to first order in \epsilon, you can use \epsilon \ \bar{g}_{ab}(x) = \epsilon \ g_{ab}(x) when you Tylor-expand \bar{g}_{cd} (\bar{x}) and when you multiply \bar{g}_{cd}(x) by other \epsilon-terms:
g_{ab}(x) = \left( \delta^{c}_{a} + \epsilon \ \partial_{a}Y^{c}\right) \left( \delta^{d}_{b} + \epsilon \ \partial_{b}Y^{d} \right) \left( \bar{g}_{cd}(x) + \epsilon \ Y^{e}\partial_{e} g_{cd}(x) \right) . So, to first order, you can rewrite this as - \frac{1}{\epsilon} \left( \bar{g}_{ab} - g_{ab}\right) (x) \equiv - \left( \mathcal{L}_{Y}g\right)_{ab} (x) = Y^{c}\partial_{c}g_{ab} + g_{ac}\partial_{b}Y^{c} + g_{cb}\partial_{a}Y^{c} .
 
  • Like
Likes Woolyabyss
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K