Cornell physics PhD admissions? Is it pointless for me to even apply?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential for admission into a physics PhD program at Cornell, specifically focusing on the applicant's academic background, GRE scores, and interest in accelerator physics. Participants explore the implications of the applicant's previous experiences and qualifications in relation to various graduate programs.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • The applicant has a dual BS in Electrical Engineering and Physics, a GPA of 3.44, and a GRE quantitative score of 760, which they consider respectable.
  • Some participants suggest that engineering programs may accept the applicant for an unfunded MS, potentially leading to a PhD if they perform well.
  • There is a proposal for the applicant to consider applied physics programs, although the applicant expresses a preference for a traditional physics PhD.
  • Concerns are raised about the applicant's previous struggles with the quantitative section of the GRE, with suggestions for self-study to improve skills before applying to PhD programs.
  • One participant notes that the GRE does not test vector calculus and questions whether the applicant's issues were related to time management rather than a lack of understanding of the material.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the applicant's chances of admission to Cornell and whether retaking the GRE would be beneficial. There is no consensus on the necessity of addressing quantitative skills prior to applying.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes varying perspectives on the relevance of GRE scores and the applicant's academic history, with some participants emphasizing the importance of quantitative skills in physics while others focus on the applicant's strengths and experiences.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals considering applying to physics or applied physics graduate programs, particularly those with non-traditional backgrounds or concerns about standardized testing performance.

Physics_UG
Gold Member
Messages
287
Reaction score
2
I graduated 4 years ago from a small university and received a dual BS in EE and physics. I went into a decently ranked EE PhD program but dropped out after a year. I attempted to go back a couple times but just didn't care too much for the courses and dropped my classes both times. I have since realized that physics is my real passion and I want to study accelerator physics in grad school.

My ugrad GPA is 3.44 overall (much higher in physics classes though). My pgre score is a 600 and I have decided that I will not retake it since I don't have enough time to prepare for a retake at this point. I know I can get very very good letters of rec from my two research advisors from when I was in the EE PhD program and I have two coauthor publications from that experience as well as a first place win in a national competition where I presented my research and wrote a paper on it. My general GRE quant score was a 760 but I can't remember what my verbal score was. I have a history of bombing the quant section on the prior times I took the GRE but the most recent time I got my score up to 760, which I think is respectable.

I am interested in experimental accelerator physics and I believe my background in engineering will be highly appreciated in this field.

What do you think? Do I have a shot at a school like Cornell? If not, what are some accelerator programs I might have a shot at? I would like to stay within an 8 hr drive from Michigan so I am looking at the midwest and the new england area.

Thanks!

P.S. I applied for cornell's EE PhD program about 4 yrs back and was accepted into the masters program without funding.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Most engineering programs will take you for an unfunded MS. If you do well, then they may take you for a PhD.

With your background you might try for an Applied Physics program.
 
Thanks Ultrafast. I have thought about an applied physics program but I think I would like to stick with a traditional physics PhD.

Also, I took the GRE three times. The first two times I bombed the quantitative section. The third time I took it I only took the verbal and quant sections and skipped the writing (was told by another physics program to not take it) but did better on the quant section. Do you think I should retake it if I apply to other schools or will they not care?
 
Why the problems with the quantitative section? You will want to address that prior to applying to any PhD program in physics: you cannot do physics without the quantitative skills.

You might do this through self-study. Spend six to eight weeks working through vector calculus via Schey's "Div, Grad, Curl and All That", working all of the problems as you go.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393925161/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
UltrafastPED said:
Why the problems with the quantitative section? You will want to address that prior to applying to any PhD program in physics: you cannot do physics without the quantitative skills.

You might do this through self-study. Spend six to eight weeks working through vector calculus via Schey's "Div, Grad, Curl and All That", working all of the problems as you go.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0393925161/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The GRE does not test vector calculus. Not knowing vector calc (which I do know it) isn't the reason for doing poorly on the GRE.

My quantitative skills are fine. I just kept running out of time. The third time I took it I got a 760 which is OK (ran out of time this time also with about 5 problems left).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K