Maximizing Interactions: A Corollary to Occam's Razor

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around the philosophical implications of Occam's Razor and its corollary proposed by Loren Booda, which states that "the overall physical system is such that maximizes interactions." Participants debate the validity of this corollary against the Principle of Least Action, which suggests minimizing interactions. The conversation highlights the tension between simplifying assumptions and the complexity of physical systems, with references to Einstein's theories and personal anecdotes about interactions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Occam's Razor and its philosophical implications
  • Familiarity with the Principle of Least Action in physics
  • Basic knowledge of physical systems and interactions
  • Awareness of historical figures in physics, particularly Albert Einstein
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Occam's Razor in scientific theory development
  • Explore the Principle of Least Action and its applications in physics
  • Investigate the role of interactions in complex systems
  • Study the historical context of Einstein's theories and their impact on modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, and students interested in the interplay between simplicity and complexity in scientific theories, as well as anyone exploring the nature of interactions in physical systems.

Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Occam's razor may be stated: "No more things should be presumed to exist than are absolutely necessary."

My corollary: "The overall physical system is such that maximizes interactions."
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by Loren Booda
My corollary: "The overall physical system is such that maximizes interactions."

I don't know lbooda... I mean the Principle of Least Action tells us that the interactions of a physical system should be minimized.

eNtRopY
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
My corollary: "The overall physical system is
such that maximizes interactions."
Why ?
 
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Occam's razor may be stated: "No more things should be presumed to exist than are absolutely necessary."


Why such a pessimistic note? Did some complicated pet theory fail to deliver?
 


I think something bad happened to Alexander
today according to his responses. Or maybe
he's just a bit drunk or something...
 
Not yet.

That is why.
 
drag - eNtRopY may be correct, but I did mean the entire physical system rather than a simple closed path, and the number of interactions rather than the total action.

Alexander, you caught me with my weak assumptions trying to emulate Einstein's success. Didn't he have a lot of "pet" theories, at least a lot of girlfriend interactions, thus a lot of young Einsteins?

I'd be interested to see yall's best pet theories.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
14K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K