Correct operation for coordinates of hoop particle system?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the correct formulation of the x-coordinate for a particle in a hoop particle system using Lagrangian mechanics. The equation presented, x = R*theta + R*sin(phi), is debated, with the suggestion that it should be x = R*theta - R*sin(phi) due to the opposite directions of the particle's motion and the center of mass (CM) of the hoop. The importance of defining the positive direction for kinematic variables such as x, y, theta, and phi is emphasized, as these definitions significantly impact the signs in the equations. The conversation highlights the necessity of clear variable definitions in physics problems to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Galilean relativity
  • Knowledge of kinematic variables and their definitions
  • Basic concepts of coordinate systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Lagrangian mechanics in detail, focusing on particle systems
  • Learn about Galilean relativity and its applications in classical mechanics
  • Research the significance of defining coordinate systems in physics problems
  • Explore examples of particle motion in constrained systems, such as hoops or rings
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, educators teaching Lagrangian dynamics, and anyone involved in solving complex motion problems in constrained systems.

FallenApple
Messages
564
Reaction score
61

Homework Statement


All in the pic below. Part of the solution presented. Didn't present the whole thing as that would clutter the page.

I just want to know how they set up the x coordinate for the particle.

HoopAndRing.png

Homework Equations


This problem is just about using the lagragian. So my issue is with the first line in the solution. x=R*theta+R*sin(phi) where x is presumably the position of the particle relative to the lab frame. This is just using gallian relativity.

The Attempt at a Solution



Shouldn't it be x=R*theta--R*sin(phi) instead? We have to minus the x position of the particle relative to the hoop frame from the x position of the hoop itself since we know that they are in opposite directions. As the particle slides down from the right moving to the left, the CM of the hoop must move right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Part of the setup of a problem is to define the positive direction for the kinematic variables. In the problem statement and in the solution, the variables ##x, y, \theta## and ##\phi## are not defined. In particular, there is no indication whether ##\theta## increases in the counterclockwise direction or the clockwise direction. Likewise, for ##\phi##. Also, there is no indication if ##x## is positive to the right or to the left. These definitions will determine the signs in ##x = \pm R\theta \pm R \sin \phi##. The fact that the CM of the hoop moves opposite to the particle's motion is not relevant here. This fact will follow from solving the equations of motion with the appropriate initial conditions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FallenApple and mastrofoffi
TSny said:
Part of the setup of a problem is to define the positive direction for the kinematic variables. In the problem statement and in the solution, the variables ##x, y, \theta## and ##\phi## are not defined. In particular, there is no indication whether ##\theta## increases in the counterclockwise direction or the clockwise direction. Likewise, for ##\phi##. Also, there is no indication if ##x## is positive to the right or to the left. These definitions will determine the signs in ##x = \pm R\theta \pm R \sin \phi##. The fact that the CM of the hoop moves opposite to the particle's motion is not relevant here. This fact will follow from solving the equations of motion with the appropriate initial conditions.

Thanks, that makes sense. Everything is relative to the coordinate set up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K