(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); 1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Eddy wrote on his midterm exam that the definition of the limit is the

following: The sequence {an} converges to the real number L if there

exists an N ∈ Natural numbers so that for every [itex]\epsilon[/itex] > 0 we have |an − L| < [itex]\epsilon[/itex] for all

n > N. Show Eddy why he is wrong by demonstrating that if this were

the definition of the limit then it would not be true that lim n→∞ 1/n = 0.

(Hint: What does it mean if |a − b| < [itex]\epsilon[/itex] for every [itex]\epsilon[/itex] > 0?)

2. Relevant equations

|a-b| <ε means that ||a|-|b|| < ε from the reverse triangle inequality

3. The attempt at a solution

I know it has to do with the fact that the actual definition of a limit has "for every ε > 0, there exists an N [itex]\in[/itex] Natural numbers S.T. ...." so, Eddy reversed that part of the definition. I just haven't been able to quite see the difference of the two. A little push in the right direction would be greatly appreciated. I like figuring these out on my own, so no full on answers, please.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Correct this improper definition of a limit

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**