Correspondence Theorem in Group Theory

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding a specific part of the proof for the Correspondence Theorem in group theory, particularly the inclusion of the normal subgroup N within the subset β(H*) of G. The user initially struggles to see why N is contained in β(H*), which is defined as the set of elements g in G such that gN is in H*. Clarification comes from recognizing that for any element g in N, the coset gN equals N, confirming that these elements are indeed included in β(H*). The conclusion is that since N is a subgroup and contains the identity element, it follows that β(H*) must also contain elements from N. This understanding resolves the user's confusion about the theorem's proof.
TheShrike
Messages
44
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I'm following the proof for this theorem in my textbook, and there is one part of it that I can't understand. Hopefully you can help me. Here is the part of the theorem and proof up to where I'm stuck:

Let ##N## be a normal subgroup of a group ##G##. Then every subgroup of the quotient group ##G/N## is of the form ##H/N## for some subgroup ##H## of ##G## with ##H\le G##.

...

Proof: Let ##H^*## be a subgroup of ##G/N## so that it consists of a certain set ##\{hN\}## of left cosets of ##N## in ##G##. We define the subset ##\beta(H^*)## of ##G## to be ##\{g\in G:gN\in H^*\}##. Then ##\beta(H^*)## clearly contains N and is a subgroup of G:

[here follows demonstration that ##\beta(H^*)## is a subgroup of G]


The portion in red is what I'm having trouble with. I don't see why it's immediately clear that ##N## is contained within ##\beta(H^*)##.

Any help is appreciated.

I first thought that perhaps ##H^*## is supposed to correspond to the ##H## of the hypothesis, but then I realized that cannot be true, since the elements of ##\beta(H^*)## would be precisely those of ##H## and the properties would be trivial. In particular, proving that ##\beta(H^*)## is a subgroup of ##G## would be pointless.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the identity of ##H^*## exactly the coset ##N##?
 
That's correct. So we know the identity element ##1## belongs to ##\beta(H*)##. We also know that ##N## is a subgroup, so ##1\in N##. Therefore ##\beta(H*)## contains at least one element of ##N##.
 
TheShrike said:
...

We define the subset ##\beta(H^*)## of ##G## to be ##\{g\in G:gN\in H^*\}##.

For each g \in N ,\ gN = N and N \in H^*, so g\in \beta(H^*)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ah, well that clears that up. Thanks.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
534
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
861
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
883
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K