Corrosion Resistance Test for Steel Conduit: Hypothesis Setup and Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter needhelp83
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The corrosion resistance test for steel conduit involved burying 45 specimens in soil for two years, measuring a sample average penetration of 52.7 mils with a standard deviation of 4.8. The null hypothesis (Ho) stated that the true average penetration is 50 mils, while the alternative hypothesis (Ha) posited it is greater than 50 mils. Initially, the test statistic was incorrectly interpreted, but upon correction, it was determined that 3.77 exceeds the critical value of 1.645, leading to the rejection of Ho. Consequently, the specifications for corrosion resistance properties were not met, and the conduits will not be used.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hypothesis testing in statistics
  • Familiarity with Z-tests and significance levels
  • Knowledge of standard deviation and sample mean calculations
  • Basic concepts of corrosion resistance in materials science
NEXT STEPS
  • Review statistical hypothesis testing methodologies
  • Learn about Z-test applications and interpretations
  • Study corrosion resistance testing standards for steel materials
  • Explore advanced statistical analysis techniques for material testing
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, quality assurance engineers, and statisticians involved in testing and evaluating the performance of steel conduits and other materials for corrosion resistance.

needhelp83
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Ok...this is one of my first hypothesis test, so I wanted to make sure I am doing everything correctly. Thanks for any suggestions.

To obtain information on the corrosion-resistance properties of a certain type of steel conduit, 45 specimens are buried in soil for a 2-yr period. The maximum penetration (in mils) for each specimen is then measured, yielding a sample average penetration of \overline{x} = 52.7 and a sample standard deviation of s = 4.8. The conduits were manufactured with the specification that true average penetration be at most 50 mils. They will be used unless it can be demonstrated conclusively that the specification hasn't been met.

Ho: \mu=50
Ha: \mu>50

Test criteria:
Z=\frac{\overline{x}-50}{s/\sqrt{n}} = \frac{52.7-50}{4.8/\sqrt{45}}= 3.77

Significance level = 95%, so Z .05 = 1.645

1.645>3.77 False
Since 1.645 !> 3.77, we don't reject Ho.

We cannot conclude that the specifications have not been met, so the corrosion resistance properties will be used.

Thanks again for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) The significance level would never be set to 95% - do you mean 5%?
b) You've carried out your test incorrectly - go back and look at how the calculated test statistic and the critical value (this is the 1.645) should be used.
 
a) The significance level would never be set to 95% - do you mean 5%?

Yes, I meant 5%

b) You've carried out your test incorrectly - go back and look at how the calculated test statistic and the critical value (this is the 1.645) should be used.

Yes, I interpreted my notes wrong for the test statistic and critical value.

It should be

3.77 > 1.645

Since 3.77 > 1.645 we reject Ho.


We can conclude that the specifications have not been met, so the corrosion resistance properties will not be used.
 
Is this what you were referring to statdad?
 
Perfect - yes, now you have it. I see I missed an earlier question from you - sorry about that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
13K