Cosets of Monoids: Conditions for Partitions

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnb96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conditions under which cosets of a submonoid H in a monoid M can form a partition of M. Unlike groups, where cosets always partition the group, this is not generally true for monoids. However, if there exists a monoid homomorphism f: M_1 → M_2, where H is defined as the kernel of f, the equivalence classes of this kernel can partition M_1. This establishes a connection between kernel equivalence relations and cosets in monoids.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of monoids and submonoids
  • Knowledge of monoid homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with equivalence relations
  • Basic concepts of group theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of monoid homomorphisms in detail
  • Explore equivalence relations and their applications in algebra
  • Investigate the structure of kernels in algebraic systems
  • Examine the differences between groups and monoids regarding cosets
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying abstract algebra, particularly those interested in the properties of monoids and their applications in theoretical frameworks.

mnb96
Messages
711
Reaction score
5
Hi,

We know that given a group G and a subgroup H, the cosets of H in G partition the set G.
Now, if instead of groups we consider a monoid M and a submonoid H, the cosets of H in M in general do not partition the set M.

However, are there some conditions that we can impose on H under which its cosets still form a partition of M?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let M_1 be a monoid and suppose there exists a monoid homomorphism f: M_1 \rightarrow M_2 from M_1 onto another monoid M_2. Let H be the kernel of f as a set. There is also a definition of "kernel" that defines it as an equivalence relation. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kernel_(set_theory)) The equivalence classes of that equivalence relation partition partition M_1. I think those classes are analagous to cosets.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
564
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
869
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
887
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K