Coude Spectrograph vs Cassegrain?

  • #1
Summary:
Explain how there can be a flux throughput advantage in using a coude spectrograph compared to a Cassegrain spectrograph?
What is Flux Throughput? Explain how there can be a flux throughput advantage in using a coude spectrograph compared to a Cassegrain spectrograph?

I'm confused on what this actually means when comparing the two. Is it asking what are the seeing advantages in terms of resolving powers of a Coude vs a Cassegrain?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
198
68
I am not sure your question can be answered as it stands. Classical spectrograph design is a complex trade off between, resolution, sensitivity and spectral range. Its dimensions also scale with telescope aperture and focal length. Google spectroscopy design and look out for etendue which encapsulates throughput.

Regards Andrew
 
  • #3
If you don't know what flux throughput is, there is little change you would understand an answer about flux throughput advantage.

For any spectrograph (or any measurement), you have to be concerned about the ratio of the signal versus the noise. For a spectrograph, the signal is easy to understand. The more light you collect, the stronger the signal.

One source of noise is the electronics of your detector. For astronomical devices, the detector is usually cooled which significantly reduces noise from the electronics.

A spectrograph sorts photons by wavelength. You parse light into different buckets that cover a range of wavelengths. This isn't a perfect process and some photons don't get sorted properly. This is known as stray light - that is to say light that is scattered inside the instrument. A properly designed spectrograph will have low stray light. There are very efficient methods of correcting for stray light in a spectrograph see https://www.researchgate.net/public...orrection_method_for_array_spectroradiometers

You also have to consider the resolution. Detecting the signal in a 1nm bucket gives you a strong signal. Parse that light into 0.1 nm (1 angstrom) or 0.01 nm (0.1 angstrom) bins spreads that light out even more and the amount of light in each bin is lower. (It is also more difficult to sort the light so precisely).

Early spectrographs used a diffraction grating to sort light. A diffraction grating reflects (or refracts) light at different angles depending on its wavelength. A longer focal length increases the resolution, but may increase stray light. A longer focal length also increases the physical size of a spectrograph.

BTW: Cassegrain is a specific

Using a second diffraction grating (double monochromator) improves resolution since you are basically sorting the light twice.

A spectrograph can use a single detector and rotate the diffraction grating(s) to measure the signal vs wavelength. The slower the scan speed, the higher the resolution. This also means more time to collect a spectrum. Virtually all spectrographs these days use detector arrays which allows measurements of light at thousands of wavelengths simultaneously.

I hope this background helps you enough to let you find additional answers on your own.

BTW: Cassegrain is a specific type of optical design for a telescope. Coude (French for "elbow") refers to a focal point. The coude focus is stationary which makes it easier to install large or complex equipment.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes AlphaCrucis, davenn and BvU
  • #4
If you don't know what flux throughput is, there is little change you would understand an answer about flux throughput advantage.

For any spectrograph (or any measurement), you have to be concerned about the ratio of the signal versus the noise. For a spectrograph, the signal is easy to understand. The more light you collect, the stronger the signal.

One source of noise is the electronics of your detector. For astronomical devices, the detector is usually cooled which significantly reduces noise from the electronics.

A spectrograph sorts photons by wavelength. You parse light into different buckets that cover a range of wavelengths. This isn't a perfect process and some photons don't get sorted properly. This is known as stray light - that is to say light that is scattered inside the instrument. A properly designed spectrograph will have low stray light. There are very efficient methods of correcting for stray light in a spectrograph see https://www.researchgate.net/public...orrection_method_for_array_spectroradiometers

You also have to consider the resolution. Detecting the signal in a 1nm bucket gives you a strong signal. Parse that light into 0.1 nm (1 angstrom) or 0.01 nm (0.1 angstrom) bins spreads that light out even more and the amount of light in each bin is lower. (It is also more difficult to sort the light so precisely).

Early spectrographs used a diffraction grating to sort light. A diffraction grating reflects (or refracts) light at different angles depending on its wavelength. A longer focal length increases the resolution, but may increase stray light. A longer focal length also increases the physical size of a spectrograph.

BTW: Cassegrain is a specific

Using a second diffraction grating (double monochromator) improves resolution since you are basically sorting the light twice.

A spectrograph can use a single detector and rotate the diffraction grating(s) to measure the signal vs wavelength. The slower the scan speed, the higher the resolution. This also means more time to collect a spectrum. Virtually all spectrographs these days use detector arrays which allows measurements of light at thousands of wavelengths simultaneously.

I hope this background helps you enough to let you find additional answers on your own.

BTW: Cassegrain is a specific type of optical design for a telescope. Coude (French for "elbow") refers to a focal point. The coude focus is stationary which makes it easier to install large or complex equipment.
Amazing answer! Thanks so much; it definitely cleared up a few things for me.
 

Related Threads on Coude Spectrograph vs Cassegrain?

Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Top