Could a 100% hydraulic system as a vehicle prime mover work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using a 100% hydraulic system as a vehicle prime mover. Participants compare hydraulic systems to electric prime movers, focusing on off-the-shelf components, performance, longevity, and simplicity. It is established that while hydraulic drive systems are common in specialized vehicles, their cost-effectiveness diminishes in smaller vehicles like passenger cars. The conversation also highlights the importance of optimizing fluid flow to prevent heat generation in hydraulic systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydraulic drive systems and their components
  • Knowledge of pump and motor technology, particularly in hydraulic applications
  • Familiarity with vehicle dynamics and drivetrain configurations
  • Basic principles of fluid mechanics and flow optimization
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest advancements in hydraulic pump and motor technology
  • Explore the design and implementation of hydrostatic drive systems in vehicles
  • Investigate cost-benefit analyses of hydraulic systems versus electric prime movers
  • Learn about optimizing hydraulic fluid flow to enhance system efficiency
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, vehicle designers, and anyone interested in alternative vehicle propulsion systems, particularly those exploring hydraulic technology in automotive applications.

jettlea
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Given: I understand that there would have to be the equivalent energy source to drive the pump. That I will look to later (my gut says the real issue), but for the purposes of this discussion, assume endless power from a source of electricity or hydraulic pressure/flow, and you have to build a system and integrate it into a demonstrable vehicle asap.

Two initial questions:

1. In a perfect world, between an electric prime mover and a hydraulic, which would (in your view) be better vis-a-vis: off the shelf components, performance, longevity, and simplicity.

2. If a hydraulic prime mover is indeed better, could you not simply mount up the motor to the yoke of the differential and achieve the same performance (thereby by-passing the need for a transmission)?

I have been thinking about this for a couple of weeks and am trying to get a handle on this.


Thanks in advance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
jettlea said:
Given: I understand that there would have to be the equivalent energy source to drive the pump. That I will look to later (my gut says the real issue), but for the purposes of this discussion, assume endless power from a source of electricity or hydraulic pressure/flow, and you have to build a system and integrate it into a demonstrable vehicle asap.

Two initial questions:

1. In a perfect world, between an electric prime mover and a hydraulic, which would (in your view) be better vis-a-vis: off the shelf components, performance, longevity, and simplicity.

2. If a hydraulic prime mover is indeed better, could you not simply mount up the motor to the yoke of the differential and achieve the same performance (thereby by-passing the need for a transmission)?

I have been thinking about this for a couple of weeks and am trying to get a handle on this.Thanks in advance

Welcome to the PF.

I don't know if it helps, but 2-wheel drive motorcycles have been using hydraulic drive for a number of years now:

http://www.gizmag.com/go/2351/

.
 
Hydrostatic drive vehicles are very common although I haven't heard of it for regular passenger automotive vehicles. Do you have something different in mind or can I assume you are thinking powering a hydraulic pump with some type of engine (gasoline, diesel, etc.) and then controlling the flow to one or more hydraulic motors (wheel motors, single motor at differential input shaft, etc.)?
 
Yes, driving the hydraulic pump with another source of energy (diesel, gas, etc.).
 
Lots and lots of special designed vehicles do all that you propose already. I've worked with and around them for decades. With recent improvements in pump and motor technology, it now seems reasonable for a very large variety of vehicle sizes. The trouble is that for smaller vehicles, like passenger cars, the fluid power is much more expensive than conventional options. But if I have to design a thousand ton crane to lift a load and roll down a rail, I'd have no other reasonable options than fluid power.
 
Its not 100% but close enough

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3003264

http://blog.cardomain.com/2008/03/28/ford-explorer-g/

actually I looked into this for my car with these specs,

Speed: 400-4000 rpm (67 rev/sec)
Disp Size: 2pcs 378 cm/rev (29 in^3/rev)
Pressure: 0-276 Bar (0-27Mpa) (0-4000psi) max 5000psi
Flow rate: 809l/min (13.5 L/s)(213gpm) or 1pc 1618 L/min (27 L/sec)(427gpm)
Power: 300kW working (402 Hp working) or 1 pc 745 kw (theoretical) (600kW working)
Torque: 1424Nm (12605 in-lb)(1050 ft-lb)
direction: Bi-directional
material: steel/iron preferred, others optional
type: internal gear positive displacement preferred, others optional
shaft: axial or radial, splined
QTY: 1 or 2
Fluid: Hyd, normal vis.
flange/port: code 62 preferred or at providers discretion
Mounting: suitable
Noise: N/A
Temp: 15-100 degrees C

the quote was $9000-$12000 for each pump
 
Last edited:
A lot of care would need to be taken to optimize the flow of the fluid or you will just generate heat.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K