Is the theory/hypothesis/experiment intended as a story hook to drive her/them into an alternate world, hot on the trail?
It seems there's two hurdles to overcome in the story: one is 'OMG, there's alternate dimensions' and two is 'OMG, in this alternate world they're descendants of Earth Cephalopods' - in that order.
What combination of those two do you need to tackle?
This makes it sound like you need to tackle both.
I think you might want to address them both separately, in two side-by-side storylines, until they merge when the two scientists finally discover each other.
What I'm not sure about is how this is possible. Why would a scientist, exploring the Canyon in this world, discover anything from an alternate world?
What if - I don't know - the Cephologist is exploring paleocephalopodology - as a way of getting us readers up to speed on cephalopods - while on the primary plotline, the physicist fires up his Alternate-World-o-matic and summons a sentient Ceph. The Ceph of course, is utterly inscrutable, and she needs to bring in an expert in Ceph behavior.I am not sure how you're going to get over the hurdle that Cephalopods, having no bones, should be effectively non-existent in the fossil record. Is there an abyssal equivalent of preservation in amber? What if a Ceph was preserved, in situ in a pyroclastic flow?
So now that she has a sample to study, is there some way that a Cephologist might need the services of a physicist to ... er ... image ... Cephalopod remains, and that's what bring them together?
Cephologist keeps getting back images from the X-ray-o-matic lab that are useless. They are blown out with artifacts. A bit of sleuthing with the X-ray-o-matic lab suggests it is an artifact of neutrino exposure. Physicist steps in and discovers there are double or treble the number of neutrinos emitted from this specimen as there should be. Almost as if there's overlapping duplicate neutrino sources...