Could Space-Time Variability Explain Unexpected Spacecraft Speeds?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cary cato
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Space-time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothesis that variability in the time component of space-time could account for the unexpected speeds and accelerations of spacecraft, such as the Pioneer and Voyager probes. This theory suggests that if time is not a constant, the necessary time corrections to reconcile discrepancies in spacecraft velocities and accelerations would be uniform across different missions. The idea is presented as a testable proposition, inviting further investigation into the implications of non-constant time on spacecraft dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with spacecraft dynamics and propulsion systems
  • Knowledge of gravitational assist maneuvers
  • Basic principles of astrophysics and space-time concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of non-constant time in Einstein's relativity
  • Explore the physics behind gravitational assists in spacecraft trajectories
  • Investigate the Pioneer anomaly and its potential explanations
  • Study experimental methods for testing variations in space-time
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in advanced space-time theories and their applications in spacecraft navigation and performance analysis.

cary cato
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
if the time component of space-time is not a constant as assumed, i think it could explain the old question of why our spacecraft don't move at the expected speed/acceleration.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/11/rosetta-space-mystery-could-be-clue-to-a-new-physics.html#more
 
Physics news on Phys.org
this should be a testable idea. for example, the time-correction necessary to match the velocity and/or acceration for all the discreptancies, pioneer probe, voyger probe, gravity assisted acceleration, etc. ...should be identical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K