Undergrad Could the probability distribution itself be quantised?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of quantization in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding probability distributions and wave functions. It explores the implications of the quantum multiverse interpretation, suggesting that each quantum decision results in a universe split, but questions the smoothness of the resulting probability distribution. Some participants argue that many quantum phenomena are continuous rather than discrete, challenging the notion that everything is quantized. The idea that space and time are quantized is presented as a hypothesis rather than a confirmed fact. Overall, the conversation highlights misconceptions about quantum mechanics and the nature of wave functions.
Robert Webb
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
The quantum multiverse would require infinite splitting for the probability function to be perfectly smooth, wouldn't it?
Everything is quantised when you look at it close enough. What about quantum probability waves themselves?

If the quantum multiverse interpretation were true, then each quantum decision leads to a splitting of the universe. But this isn't a binary choice, it's a probability distribution. For that graph to be smooth, the universe would have to split infinitely many times at each collapse of the wave function, wouldn't it?

So far we haven't encountered any true infinities in our universe. Space and time are probably quantised, not true continuums. What about the quantum wave function itself? I only have a lay person's understanding of any of this, but as I understand it, the multiverse interpretation says that rather than a quantum decision being random, all options are pursued, and interact with each other somehow to produce the wave function. But unless the splitting is infinite, this function wouldn't be perfectly smooth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Robert Webb said:
Everything is quantised when you look at it close enough.

This is not correct, though it is a common misconception. There are plenty of phenomena in quantum mechanics that are continuous, not discrete. A simple example is the energy and momentum of a free particle.

Robert Webb said:
What about quantum probability waves themselves?

The wave function is continuous.

Robert Webb said:
If the quantum multiverse interpretation were true, then each quantum decision leads to a splitting of the universe.

This is another common misconception that is not correct. We have plenty of threads on the MWI that discuss why; going into detail about that is probably better handled by starting a separate thread on that topic (preferably after spending some time reading previous threads on the topic).

Robert Webb said:
this isn't a binary choice, it's a probability distribution

That depends on the specific measurement; for measurements where the results are quantized, there can indeed be a binary choice--a simple example is a spin measurement on a spin-1/2 particle.

Robert Webb said:
Space and time are probably quantised, not true continuums.

"Probably" is way too strong given our current state of knowledge. It's a hypothesis, which at this point we can't to much to investigate, that's all.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K