Could the Seebeck Effect Be Causing Boiler Failures?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikej
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential causes of boiler failures, specifically examining whether the Seebeck effect could be generating micro amp DC currents that confuse the flame detection system. Participants explore various technical aspects related to boiler operation, flame rectification, and grounding issues, with a focus on troubleshooting intermittent failures in heating systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a boiler failure characterized by rapid cycling of the gas relay when there is no flame, suggesting that the Seebeck effect might be generating a micro amp DC current that confuses the detection system.
  • Another participant agrees that a micro amp DC current could be generated but expresses doubt that it would confuse the flame detection system, emphasizing that such systems should be isolated from ground currents.
  • A different participant notes that replacing the controller did not resolve the issue and highlights the possibility of a DC bias at the electrode relative to ground, indicating that the setup is problematic and has not been resolved by engineers.
  • Suggestions are made to investigate the grounding of controllers and the potential for intermittent connections in the wiring to sensors, as well as the possibility of using the gas supply line as an electrical ground.
  • One participant introduces the concept of flame rectification, explaining how current flows in the flame sensing circuit and the importance of maintaining a minimum current to keep the gas valve open.
  • Another participant shares observations from testing, indicating that the failure occurs when the system is hot and suggests that a faulty grounding through the pilot's tri-metal junction may be a significant factor.
  • Concerns are raised about the design of the units, with one participant noting that the securing screw for the burner may become loose again, leading to potential safety hazards.
  • A suggestion is made for the participant to communicate their findings to the manufacturer, including a proposal for a retrofit kit to improve grounding reliability.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the role of the Seebeck effect and grounding issues in causing boiler failures. While some agree on the potential influence of grounding and flame rectification, there is no consensus on the exact cause of the failures or the effectiveness of proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in the current understanding of the system's behavior, particularly regarding the interactions between grounding, flame detection, and the effects of temperature on system performance. There are unresolved questions about the reliability of the design and the potential for recurring issues.

Mikej
A practical problem. A floor mounted boiler frp failed by cycling on and off rapidly with the main gas relay opening closing when there was no flame. This may be happening only when the igniter system is still hot.
The main earthing is through the pilot gas tube, using an aluminum pipe with a brass olive into steel. There is considerable heat curve between the pipe and the steel electrode. Could a micro amp dc current be generating by the Seebeck effect to confuse the detection system?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Could a micro amp DC current be generated? Absolutely.
Could it confuse the detection system? I am thinking that you are talking about the flame detection system - but perhaps not. In any case, any product detection system should be well isolated from the affects of ground currents. So my guess would be "No".
Of course, it would take a closer examination of the system to know with any certainty. But I really doubt it.
 
Thanks Scott, I think unlikely, but replacing the controller doesn't fix it. It is stopping lockouts which I thought impossible. The issue is that the electrode would have a DC bias relative to ground. I don't know, the setup is mikeymouse, happens on several waterheaters and no engineer has yet found the reason. It is intermittent, maybe temperature related but passes every test on the manufacturers test lab..any other ideas?
 
.Scott said:
...any product detection system should be well isolated from the affects of ground currents...
Mikej said:
...the setup is mikeymouse, happens on several waterheaters...
The operative words are bolded above. Follow-up your hunches. Any way of even temporarily connecting a wire across the aluminum-steel joint? Try disconnecting the sensor on a problematic device. Could be an intermittent open or ground in wiring to the sensors. Also check grounding of controllers. It could even be an issue with the power source. Or someone may even have decided to use the gas supply line as an electrical ground somewhere in the building.:nb)
 
hmmm

Flame rectification? New to me, just looked it up.

http://www.achrnews.com/articles/98085-troubleshooting-a-flame-rectification-system
has a couple good troubleshooting ideas...

https://yorkcentraltechtalk.wordpress.com/2011/05/23/the-phenomenon-of-flame-rectification/ explains how it works (which i really needed)
Internally, in the control module, once flame is established, current begins flowing in the flame sensing circuit. The current energizes a relay in the control. A minimum amount of current is needed to energize this relay (microamps). When this relay pulls in, one set of contacts open to de-energize the ignition system and another set of contacts closes to keep the main gas valve energized. It is important to know the minimum microamps that are required to “lock in” the control module and keep the unit running.

If the proper amount of microamps is not present, the control will not allow the main valve to remain open and shuts the unit down. Depending on the control, it may or may not go into “retries” to prove that flame was established.

Mikej said:
cycling on and off rapidly with the main gas relay opening closing when there was no flame.

Sounds to me like it's looking for a flame that isn't there.
Does the ignitor try to start one?
 
Thank you for your ideas. The two Earth returns are by the pilot and main gas pipes.
The theory that the hot tri-metal junction is causing confusion in the rectification system seems to be correct. This morning:
Test at cold..eveything OK. Run the burner 20 mins...test failure.
Predict that the main gas pipe earthing is faulty. Cool and remove the burner and the holding screw is loose. Tighten and replace. This time at hot: no failure. The only difference is that the failure happens when the earthing is defaulted through the pilot's hot tri-metal junction.
I was doubtful that this would be the case, but now 90% likely.
The down side is that the securing screw will soon be loose again due to poor design.
There are thousands of these units with this inherent weakness- the resulting cycling can override the lockout...boom!
 
Mikej said:
There are thousands of these units with this inherent weakness- the resulting cycling can override the lockout...boom!

Sounds like good troubleshooting.

Is their sales department aware of this ?

When you're sure you're right
- here's what i would do -
Take a picture,
go to internet and find the parent company
click on "Investor Relations" then "Executive Team", find Chairman of the Board

Send to him a letter in your own handwriting describing that problem
tell him how you fixed yours with a work-around
and that you await their corporate response particularly a retrofit kit to provide an improved and reliable earthing means..

A video of the gas valve cycling wouldn't show anything because gas is invisible.
But if you tie a big feather or orange streamer to the gas nozzle so it flutters, unambiguously demonstrating the danger, then your presentation has 'Punch' .

old jim
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff, Asymptotic and Tom.G

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
53K
Replies
4
Views
10K