Could we have negative dimensions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathematicalPhysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Negative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the concept of negative dimensions, suggesting that they could be defined in a manner analogous to the Hausdorff dimension. The idea posits that negative dimensions represent a relative measure, similar to signed measures in mathematics, which capture the essence of relativity in dimensions. The conversation emphasizes that negative dimensions could exist if they are understood as having less dimension or information relative to a reference point. The discussion also references a relevant article on negative fractal dimensions for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hausdorff dimension
  • Familiarity with signed measures in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of fractals and their properties
  • Concept of relative measures in geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Negative Fractal Dimensions" by Benoit Mandelbrot
  • Explore the mathematical implications of signed measures
  • Investigate the properties of Hausdorff dimension in detail
  • Study the concept of relativity in mathematical dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students interested in advanced geometry and dimensional analysis, particularly those exploring theoretical concepts in fractals and dimensions.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
So I had a discussion with my brother about this (it was sort of a joke, but I am a mathematician and every joke I turn into a theorem and vice versa... :-)), it was kinda of short.

But if we already have dimensions which aren't whole integer numbers (he didn't know that, and didn't seem interested about it) couldn't we define negative dimensions?

I sort of trying to visualise such a thing, not sure what to define here. obviously this notion should generalize Hausdorff dimension definition.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hey MathematicalPhysicist.

One thing I think you should realize is that anything negative is just something that is relative to something else.

A negative number is relative to an origin just like an angle (or its cosine) is relative in terms of orientation.e

We also have integrals and other measures that are relative and for this we call these "signed" measures which are apparent in areas, volumes, determinants, and other measures.

So in the same spirit, you could define a negative dimension is something that has some form of relativity to something else in that it has less dimension, information, or something else that maintains its meaning but capture the spirit of this relative reference.

All negative things must have this form of relativity and I don't think that its not possible to allow dimension to extend to this in the way that we do to determinants, areas, volumes, and numbers.
 
MathematicalPhysicist said:
So I had a discussion with my brother about this (it was sort of a joke, but I am a mathematician and every joke I turn into a theorem and vice versa... :-)), it was kinda of short.

But if we already have dimensions which aren't whole integer numbers (he didn't know that, and didn't seem interested about it) couldn't we define negative dimensions?

I sort of trying to visualise such a thing, not sure what to define here. obviously this notion should generalize Hausdorff dimension definition.

You should probably read this article: http://users.math.yale.edu/mandelbrot/web_pdfs/123negativeFractalDimensions.pdf .

If a single point has dimension zero, then the only way for a set of points to have negative dimension is that the set has to be empty. Apparently sets can be empty to different degrees.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
554
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K