firefox5926
- 3
- 0
my question is would a line of wind turbines have a comparable effect to a wind break in reducing wind velocity
Wind turbines are not effective as windbreaks in agricultural settings due to their height and design, which can increase wind speeds at ground level rather than reduce them. The discussion highlights that traditional windbreaks, such as hedges or low shrubs, are more effective in minimizing surface wind velocities and preventing soil erosion. Historical practices, such as planting Cypress seedlings for windbreaks, demonstrate the importance of maintaining appropriate vegetation height and density. Overall, trees and shrubs are more cost-effective and practical solutions for wind management on farms compared to wind turbines.
PREREQUISITESAgricultural engineers, farmers, environmental scientists, and landscape architects interested in optimizing wind management and soil conservation strategies in farming practices.
If that's to what the OP was referring, it's a whole different scale than what came to my mind. I was thinking of the kind we had to cut down on soil erosion in dry times on the farm or minimize snow drifting in winter due to surface winds. Hurricane taming wouldn't work on the same principle (I don't think) because of the sheer vertical area they cover and hurricanes are more susceptible to interference a higher altitudes where the "rim" speed is lower.theOrange said:If it is possible to use wind turbines to reduce the power of a hurricane
Danger said:If that's to what the OP was referring, it's a whole different scale than what came to my mind. I was thinking of the kind we had to cut down on soil erosion in dry times on the farm or minimize snow drifting in winter due to surface winds. Hurricane taming wouldn't work on the same principle (I don't think) because of the sheer vertical area they cover and hurricanes are more susceptible to interference a higher altitudes where the "rim" speed is lower.
Way back in the 1920s, Cypress seedlings were handed out for free by the Department of Agriculture so farmers could plant wind breaks. These formed good wind break hedges that only required to be trimmed once each year. Unfortunately, farmers are busy and kept putting off the inconvenient job of trimming the top of 12 foot high hedges, so the hedges became lines of trees, now between 4 and 8 foot diameter at the base, 100 foot high, dropping big old branches on buildings and equipment. The area under the trees is now bare of other vegetation and clear of low branches, which makes an efficient wind tunnel for wind obstructed by the middle part of the tree.theOrange said:You may be right, either way trees are probably more cost effective.
Yes - one can use tall trees, but at some distance from buildings and equipment. One would need lower shrubs, but also rows of trees.Baluncore said:Where trees are used as wind breaks, the species selected should remain low, such as a shrub, or have foliage that fills the area between the trees as close to the ground as possible.