Coulombs force law in a three dimensional coordinate system problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the force exerted on charge Q2 by charge Q1 using Coulomb's Law in a three-dimensional coordinate system. The charges are specified as Q1 = +37 nC located at (1,3,0) m and Q2 = +70 nC at (0,0,2) m. The participants clarify that the force is a vector quantity, with the direction determined by the difference in position vectors. The formula for the Coulomb force is given as F = (q1 * q2 * (r1 - r2)) / |r1 - r2|^3, emphasizing the need to multiply the magnitude by the unit vector along the direction of the force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law for electrostatic forces
  • Vector notation and operations in three-dimensional space
  • Understanding of point charges and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of electrostatics and force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Coulomb's Law in three dimensions
  • Learn about vector calculus, specifically in the context of physics
  • Explore the concept of unit vectors and their role in force direction
  • Investigate the implications of electrostatic forces in various physical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, vector analysis, and force calculations in three-dimensional systems.

SirPlus
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Two point charges of Q1 = +37 nC and Q2 = +70 nC are located at points (1,3,0) m and (0,0,2) m, respectively.

Q : Calculate the force exerted on Q2 by Q1.

Attempt : I applied phythagoras theorem to find the distance between Q1 and Q2, I then applied coulombs force law equation directly given r,Q1,Q2, however I am puzzled to how I could find the direction of the force and how possible i could solve the problem in vector notation ..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi SirPlus, welcome to PF.

What does Coulomb's law say about the direction of the force between two charges?

ehild
 
Nothing much, it simply tells us about the magnitude of the electrostatic force exerted on charge by the other and that this force is directly proportional to the product of charges and inversly proportional to the square of the distance between the centre of the charges - i am however intersted in the orientation of the coulombs force in a 3d space like a coordinate system, after all force is a vector quantity...
 
Thanks for the invitation dude
 
That's right! Forces are vectors. For the Coulomb Law it's
\vec{F}=\frac{q_1 q_2 (\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2)}{|\vec{r}_1-\vec{r}_2|^3}.
That's the force acting on a charge q_1 at position \vec{r}_1 due to a charge q_2 at position \vec{r}_2 (in Heaviside-Lorentz units).
 
SirPlus said:
Nothing much, it simply tells us about the magnitude of the electrostatic force exerted on charge by the other and that this force is directly proportional to the product of charges and inversly proportional to the square of the distance between the centre of the charges - i am however intersted in the orientation of the coulombs force in a 3d space like a coordinate system, after all force is a vector quantity...

See: http://faculty.wwu.edu/vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/ElectricForce/CoulombLaw.html

The Coulomb force is a vector, parallel with the line connecting the charges. The force q1 exerts on q2 points from q1 to q2, parallel with the difference of the position vectors Δr=r2-r1, if both charges have the same sign, otherwise it is in the opposite direction.
The exact, vectorial formula of the Coulomb force is what vanhees71 wrote. You need to multiply the magnitude of the Coulomb force with the unit vector parallel to Δr.

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sure, but doesn't tell me anything about the orientation of the force in a three dimensional space?
 
SirPlus said:
Sure, but doesn't tell me anything about the orientation of the force in a three dimensional space?

It does. The force is parallel to the difference of the position vectors. The position vectors r1 and r2 are given. What is their difference?

ehild
 
Thanks so we use vector notation, thanks pretty clear now ...
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K