Coulomb's law theoretical hypothetical question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the theoretical application of Coulomb's law in a scenario involving two layers of cations in a vacuum, with the question of whether a Nerf ball could be levitated by the repulsive forces of the cations. Participants concluded that electrostatics alone would not be sufficient to deflect a bullet, as the bullet is uncharged and would not experience a force. The consensus is that while the Nerf ball may float above the cations, it would likely fall through the gas if uncharged, demonstrating the limitations of electrostatic levitation in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and electrostatic forces
  • Familiarity with concepts of ionization and cation behavior
  • Knowledge of electrostatic levitation principles
  • Basic physics of charged and uncharged particles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electrostatic levitation in detail
  • Study the behavior of charged particles in a vacuum environment
  • Explore applications of Coulomb's law in modern technology
  • Investigate the limitations of electrostatics in deflecting projectiles
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, researchers in electrostatics, engineers exploring levitation technologies, and anyone interested in the practical applications of Coulomb's law.

Rhasz
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
The Scenario:
Let's say one could have a lot of cations produced from a gas in a single plane contained in a 1 square foot area (like a fence around sheep). This plane of cations is over another one that is on the ground. So basically two layers of Cations in a tall hollow cube like container such that the top layer is not pushed above the initial height by the bottom layer through repelling forces (magically forced to not go above initial height). Also the inside of the hollow cube like container is a vacuum except the before mentioned cations.
Also magically, the bottom layer is not moving up or down and the ions in the top layer can only move down as a unit, i.e the whole plane of them.

The question:
Would the top layer of ions be able to hold an object off the ground (a Nerf ball) by using the repulsive force coming from the bottom layer or would it go through the top layer of cations because they are from a gas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why so complicated? This is electrostatic levitation. You don't need vacuum, magic or whatever, charged conducting surfaces are enough.
There is one downside: you need supports at the side, or some active electronics keeping the arrangement stable.
 
mfb said:
Why so complicated? This is electrostatic levitation. You don't need vacuum, magic or whatever, charged conducting surfaces are enough.
There is one downside: you need supports at the side, or some active electronics keeping the arrangement stable.
Because I want to shoot it and have it deflect bullets like a shield in star wars or something similar.
 
Rhasz said:
Because I want to shoot it and have it deflect bullets like a shield in star wars or something similar.

You want to use electrostatics to deflect a bullet?
 
Drakkith said:
You want to use electrostatics to deflect a bullet?
Yes, like those wind tunnels used to practice skydiving except they are charged particles to work closer to the surface.
 
Rhasz said:
Yes, like those wind tunnels used to practice skydiving except they are charged particles to work closer to the surface.

Electrostatics won't deflect a bullet. The bullet isn't charged and won't experience a force.
 
But the nerf ball will be floating like the one in the original setup? I was assuming also the object was not charged.
 
Rhasz said:
But the nerf ball will be floating like the one in the original setup? I was assuming also the object was not charged.

I doubt it. It's uncharged so it would probably just fall through the gas.
 
Drakkith said:
I doubt it. It's uncharged so it would probably just fall through the gas.
Ok thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K