MHB Counting Color Combinations in 12 Triangles

Click For Summary
The problem involves coloring the edges of 12 triangles using three colors: red, green, and blue. Each triangle must have one edge of each color, leading to a specific arrangement requirement. The total number of possible colorings is calculated as $3^{24}$, but the focus is on those that meet the triangle color condition. The solution requires combinatorial analysis to determine the valid configurations. The discussion emphasizes the mathematical approach to counting these specific color combinations.
maxkor
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
There are 12 triangles (picture). We color each side of the triangle in red, green or blue. Among the $3^{24}$ possible colorings, how many have the property that every triangle has one edge of each color?
 

Attachments

  • ry.png
    ry.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 112
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[TIKZ]\coordinate (A) at (30:2) ;
\coordinate (B) at (90:2) ;
\coordinate (C) at (150:2) ;
\coordinate (D) at (210:2) ;
\coordinate (E) at (270:2) ;
\coordinate (F) at (330:2) ;
\coordinate (U) at (0:5) ;
\coordinate (V) at (60:5) ;
\coordinate (W) at (120:5) ;
\coordinate (X) at (180:5) ;
\coordinate (Y) at (240:5) ;
\coordinate (Z) at (300:5) ;
\foreach \point in {A,B,C,D,E,F,U,V,W,X,Y,Z} \fill [black] (\point) circle (3pt) ;
\draw (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- (D) -- (E) -- (F) -- (A) -- (U) -- (V) -- (W) -- (X) -- (Y) -- (Z) -- (U) --(A) -- (V) -- (B) -- (W) -- (C) -- (X) -- (D) -- (Y) -- (E) -- node[ left ]{$x$}(Z) -- node[ right ]{$z$}(F) -- node[ below ]{$y$}(U) ;
\draw (-90:3.5) node{$6$} ;
\foreach \x in {0,30,...,240} \draw (\x:3.5) node{$2$} ;
\draw (270:2.75) node{$A$} ;
\draw (240:2.75) node{$B$} ;
\draw (0:2.75) node{$C$} ;
\draw (330:2.75) node{$D$} ;
\draw (300:2.75) node{$E$} ;[/TIKZ]
Start with the triangle labelled $A$ at the bottom of the diagram. There are 6 ways to colour its three sides in different colours. Next, look at triangle $B$. One of its sides has already been coloured, and there are 2 ways to colour the remaining sides. Continuing in this way clockwise round the diagram, there are two ways to colour each of the triangles up to and including the one labelled $C$. There are now two cases to consider for the remaining triangles $D$ and $E$. If side $x$ in triangle $A$ and side $y$ in triangle $C$ have different colours then there is only one choice for the colour of side $z$ and therefore only 1 way to colour triangles $D$ and $E$. But if $x$ and $y$ have the same colour then there are two choices for the colour of side $z$, and therefore 2 ways to colour triangles $D$ and $E$.

Here's where the argument becomes probabilistic and unreliable. If the colours of $x$ and $y$ had been chosen independently at random, then the probability of them being the same would be $\frac13$, so the expected number of colourings for triangles $D$ and $E$ would be $\frac13*2 + \frac23*1 = \frac43$. Then the expected value for the number of colourings for the whole diagram would be $$6*2^9 * \frac43 = 2^{12}.$$ But in fact the colourings of $x$ and $y$ are not independent. So the above argument is not rigorous, and the answer may not even be correct (though it must be a good approximation!).
 
Opalg said:
[TIKZ]\coordinate (A) at (30:2) ;
\coordinate (B) at (90:2) ;
\coordinate (C) at (150:2) ;
\coordinate (D) at (210:2) ;
\coordinate (E) at (270:2) ;
\coordinate (F) at (330:2) ;
\coordinate (U) at (0:5) ;
\coordinate (V) at (60:5) ;
\coordinate (W) at (120:5) ;
\coordinate (X) at (180:5) ;
\coordinate (Y) at (240:5) ;
\coordinate (Z) at (300:5) ;
\foreach \point in {A,B,C,D,E,F,U,V,W,X,Y,Z} \fill [black] (\point) circle (3pt) ;
\draw (A) -- (B) -- (C) -- (D) -- (E) -- (F) -- (A) -- (U) -- (V) -- (W) -- (X) -- (Y) -- (Z) -- (U) --(A) -- (V) -- (B) -- (W) -- (C) -- (X) -- (D) -- (Y) -- (E) -- node[ left ]{$x$}(Z) -- node[ right ]{$z$}(F) -- node[ below ]{$y$}(U) ;
\draw (-90:3.5) node{$6$} ;
\foreach \x in {0,30,...,240} \draw (\x:3.5) node{$2$} ;
\draw (270:2.75) node{$A$} ;
\draw (240:2.75) node{$B$} ;
\draw (0:2.75) node{$C$} ;
\draw (330:2.75) node{$D$} ;
\draw (300:2.75) node{$E$} ;[/TIKZ]
Start with the triangle labelled $A$ at the bottom of the diagram. There are 6 ways to colour its three sides in different colours. Next, look at triangle $B$. One of its sides has already been coloured, and there are 2 ways to colour the remaining sides. Continuing in this way clockwise round the diagram, there are two ways to colour each of the triangles up to and including the one labelled $C$. There are now two cases to consider for the remaining triangles $D$ and $E$. If side $x$ in triangle $A$ and side $y$ in triangle $C$ have different colours then there is only one choice for the colour of side $z$ and therefore only 1 way to colour triangles $D$ and $E$. But if $x$ and $y$ have the same colour then there are two choices for the colour of side $z$, and therefore 2 ways to colour triangles $D$ and $E$.

Here's where the argument becomes probabilistic and unreliable. If the colours of $x$ and $y$ had been chosen independently at random, then the probability of them being the same would be $\frac13$, so the expected number of colourings for triangles $D$ and $E$ would be $\frac13*2 + \frac23*1 = \frac43$. Then the expected value for the number of colourings for the whole diagram would be $$6*2^9 * \frac43 = 2^{12}.$$ But in fact the colourings of $x$ and $y$ are not independent. So the above argument is not rigorous, and the answer may not even be correct (though it must be a good approximation!).
Almost right :)
 
I now think that the answer should be $2^{12} + 2=4098$, but I don't have a proof of that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K