Counting problem involving infinite

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a mathematical problem involving a box of balls numbered 1 through n, where balls are removed and replaced in a specific sequence. After performing this operation countably many times, it is concluded that every ball ends up back in the box. The reasoning is based on the observation that each ball is removed and then replaced in a systematic manner, ensuring that all balls eventually return. The confusion arises from the simultaneous increase in the number of balls outside the box, leading to a discussion about cardinality and the nature of infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cardinality in set theory
  • Familiarity with bijections and their implications
  • Basic knowledge of limits in mathematical analysis
  • Concept of countable infinity
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of countable vs. uncountable sets in set theory
  • Study the implications of bijections in infinite sets
  • Learn about limits and their applications in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate the paradoxes associated with infinity in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying set theory, educators teaching concepts of infinity, and anyone interested in the foundations of mathematical logic.

dsfranca
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I was confonoted with the following problem today, and thought it was interesting enough to discuss it here:

Homework Statement


You have a box with balls numbered 1,2,3...n.
Suppose you began, by taking out balls numbered 1–100
and then put ball 1 back. Suppose you then removed balls 101–200
and put ball 2 back. Then you took balls 201–300 into your lap, found
ball 3, and put it back. And so forth. After doing this countably many
times, which balls are left in your lap?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I was tempted to affirm that, as there is a bijection between the number of balls that were put back to the box and the number of times you repeat this, f(n)=n, after n steps all balls would be inside the box . However, as there is also a function from N to the number of balls you have outside, namely f(x)=99x, I would conclude that you have the same number of balls inside and outside the box, in other words, the set of balls in the box and the one of balls outside it have the same cardinality.
Is this last conclusion correct?

I hope I was able to express myself clearly!
Thanks,
Daniel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
However, as there is also a function from N to the number of balls you have outside, namely f(x)=99x

This is a function that says how many balls are out of the box on the nth step. But we're not worried about the nth step, we're worried about after you've done 'every' step. You can't plug infinity into f(x) there and get a reasonable answer.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I was tempted to affirm that, as there is a bijection between the number of balls that were put back to the box and the number of times you repeat this, f(n)=n, after n steps all balls would be inside the box .

This is a better way to think about it. To put it even better: let's track what happens to the nth ball:

It's removed from the box in step [n/100]+1 ([n/100] is n/100 rounded down). Then on step n it's added back. Then it never leaves the box again. So every ball ends up in the box at the end
 
I understand what you mean. I think we can compare this situation with a limit, given an arbitrary n ball, we can find an even bigger n so that the ball will back in the box. But what really bothers me is the fact that this solution points to every ball being in the box, although the number of balls outside the box is also increasing when the number of steps is big. Although this can be just a counter-intuitive result, I am still not satisfied with it!
Thanks,
Daniel
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K