I am reading some of "Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation."(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The paper is full of values for various inflationary parameters under various models, with their confidence intervals. For instance, in Table 5 on page 13, the authors report that — for a model including both running of the scalar spectral index and running-of-the-running, and considering Planck+WMAP+BAO data — the best values for the running and running-of-the-running are

[tex]\frac{dn_s}{d\ln k}=0.000^{+0.016}_{-0.013}[/tex]

and

[tex]\frac{d^2n_s}{d\ln k^2}=0.017^{+0.016}_{-0.014},[/tex]

where the ±'s indicate 1σ confidence intervals.

But the individual confidence levels do not tell nearly the whole story, as we see in Figure 3 on page 14, which shows the exact boundaries of the joint 1σ and 2σ confidence interval:

We see in this figure that the running and the running-of-the-running are quite highly correlated, so that you would be quite misled about the joint probabilities if you only had the individual confidence levels from Table 5 without the figure alongside.

Now the numbers I myself am actually interested in are the scalar spectral indexn, which the authors of the Planck paper report in Table 4 (Planck+WMAP+BAO):_{s}

[tex]n_s = 0.9643\pm 0.0059[/tex]

and the scalar amplitudeA, which they report in Table 3 (Planck+WMAP):_{s}

[tex]\ln(10^{10}A_s) = 3.089^{+0.024}_{-0.027};[/tex]

again, the ±'s signify 68% confidence intervals.

What I am doing is to run various simulations with different initial parameters and compute the values of the scalar amplitude and spectral index they predict. I'd like to be able to make some statement about the likelihood of the prediction by comparing to the observed values given in the Planck paper.

Unfortunately, the Planck paper does not contain a plot for scalar amplitude vs. spectral index akin to the one I included above for the running-of-running vs. running. But I imagine that the uncertainties inAand_{s}nare likewise quite correlated, and that simply treating_{s}Aand_{s}nas independent, skew-normally-distributed parameters is a poor approach._{s}

Are there other Planck papers, or publicly available Planck data somewhere (or for that matter other sections of "XXII" — I freely admit I haven't read the whole thing), that would give me a sense of the shape of the joint confidence interval forAand_{s}n?_{s}

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Covariance betw scalar amplitude & spectral index in Planck?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Covariance betw scalar | Date |
---|---|

B Current values for Friedman's scalar and its derivative? | Feb 20, 2018 |

I Experimental bound on the scalar spectral index | Jun 21, 2017 |

A Calculating the power spectra of scalar perturbation | May 16, 2017 |

I Exact expression for the tensor-to-scalar ratio | Feb 28, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**