Covariant deriv of matrix valued field(srednicki)

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LAHLH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Covariant Matrix
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
1 reply · 2K views
LAHLH
Messages
405
Reaction score
2
Hi

In ch84, Srednicki is considering the gauge group SU(N) with a real scalar field [itex]\Phi^a[/itex] in the adjoint rep. He then says it will prove more convienient to work with the matrix valued field [itex]\Phi=\Phi^a T^a[/itex] and says the covariant derivative of this is [itex]D_{\mu}\Phi=\partial_{\mu}\Phi-igA^a_{\mu}\left[T^a,\Phi\right][/itex]

Why is this covariant derivative not just [itex]D_{\mu}\Phi=\partial_{\mu}\Phi-igA^a_{\mu}T^a\Phi[/itex] ?

I understand [itex]\Phi[/itex] is a matrix and it does not commute with the generators, but I don't understand how this commutator is arising here in the second term of the covariant derivative? is it something to do with the adjoint rep?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The covariant derivative as written by Srednicki indeed contains the commutator because it is the adjoint representation of the SU(N) group. The adjoint representation has a matrix structure, and for a given generator T^a, the operation [T^a, \Phi] is the matrix multiplication of the generator with the scalar field, which gives a matrix result. Thus, the second term of the covariant derivative contains this matrix multiplication.