Crankcase Supercharging Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Morgan3
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Yamada (YS) four-stroke model airplane engine, which utilizes a rotary valve in the crankcase to compress a fuel/air mixture, achieving approximately 14 lbs of boost and a claimed 30% increase in power-to-weight ratio compared to naturally aspirated engines. The conversation raises questions about the efficiency of applying similar crankcase supercharging techniques to larger boxer engines, such as those manufactured by BMW. Concerns are expressed regarding energy waste due to pumping losses and the feasibility of using electronic fuel injection (EFI) to optimize performance without excessive displacement loss.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-stroke engine mechanics
  • Familiarity with rotary valve technology
  • Knowledge of forced induction principles
  • Basics of electronic fuel injection (EFI) systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of crankcase supercharging in larger engines
  • Investigate the impact of pumping losses in forced induction systems
  • Explore advancements in rotary valve technology for automotive applications
  • Learn about optimizing EFI systems for boosted engines
USEFUL FOR

Engine designers, automotive engineers, and enthusiasts interested in performance enhancements through forced induction and rotary valve technology.

Morgan3
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
There is a four stroke Model Airplane Engine made by Yamada (YS) that uses a rotory valve in the back of the crankcase to compress a fuel/air mixture for two rotations in the valve cover, before it is admitted by the intake valve. The fuel contains oil which lubricates the bottom end. Excluding pumping losses, this would make about 14lbs of boost. YS claims 30% increase to power/weight figures compared to nat. aspirated motors.

My question is whether this has been done with larger boxer engines, like a BMW. It would seem a huge waste of energy to blow and suck the total displacement of the engine overboard with every revolution. Even with pumping losses, it seems a waste of energy. With standard oiling, one could just pump air and use EFI to add fuel at the valve.

Am I missing something or has this been done and proven to be not useful.

PhilD
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If the crankcase is sealed there wouldn't be much loss compressing and expanding the air quickly. Pumping it through a valve like your engine would be a different story though.
 
so, with pumping losses, heating, and other issues, is there a net gain with the boost provided?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
17K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K