Create a Simple Circuit with This Easy-to-Follow Diagram

  • Thread starter Thread starter DunceKirchhoff
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around analyzing a circuit diagram and applying circuit laws to solve for current and voltage. Participants are exploring concepts related to series and parallel resistances, Kirchhoff's voltage law, and circuit simplification techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest breaking down the circuit into manageable parts and questioning the arrangement of resistors. There are discussions about the application of Kirchhoff's laws and the need for consistency in equations derived from the circuit analysis.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exchange of ideas regarding the correct application of circuit analysis methods. Some participants have offered alternative approaches and highlighted potential mistakes in the original setup. The discussion is active, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as the use of specific methods from textbooks and the challenge of learning circuit analysis independently. There are references to the complexity of the circuit and the need for clarity in the arrangement of components.

DunceKirchhoff
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
http://i43.tinypic.com/2qkikd3.jpg

How do I tackle the above question? I've got a few formulas in my head that don't help. I am not asking for answer or the working just a quick kick in the right direction.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are any resistances in series or parallel?
 
Redraw the circuit, do current loops, show your work. Then we can help.
 
Break up the circuit into manageable bits. Think about which rules or laws you should be using.
 
Am I right so far
 
Looks like a good start to me so far
 
Well what I can abstract from that is-

4i1+10+3(i1+i2)
= 17i1+3i2

6i2+2+3(i1+i2)
=11i2+3i1

17i1+3i2=20
3i1+11i2=20

It doesn't figure, must have added up something wrong :P
 
I don't really get how you got those equations, but they are both wrong and not even consistent with each other.

How much should the voltage around a loop add up to?
 
  • #10
Well with kvl it should add up to 0?
 
  • #11
DunceKirchhoff said:
Well with kvl it should add up to 0?

So why is there not a zero on one side of your equations?
 
  • #12
309ly4j.jpg


I was using this as an example. I know there is an extra battery in it, but I have solved circuits in the past using this working with one battery.

What do you make of it?
 
  • #13
I think the first mistake was done in the process of redrawing of the circuit.

Original circuit:
2qkikd3.jpg


Redrawn circuit:
(From this link) http://i44.tinypic.com/2hf7tc1.jpg
(Image size too large to imbed here directly.)

Can you see the mistake? :wink:

[Examine which resisters are on which sides of the circuit.]
 
  • #14
Hi Colin

I placed the resistors on opposite sides, although giving me a more sensible answer,it was as they say on Catchphrase 'Its good but not right!

***Bangs head off wall****
 
  • #15
When doing loops, it is best to do independent loops to the extent possible. I see now what you did but I never use that method, as I find it cumbersome. That is, I think the way you have chosen your loops is awkward. BUT ... in any case, the sum around the loop should be zero. I ask again: why is there no zero in your equations?
 
  • #16
It has no zero in it because the method out the book does not show it. Yes I understand the sum of the voltage around the circuit adds up to zero, but look at the given example there is no use of this. I'm learning on my own so I use whatever method that's in front of me. I been learning physics for like 2 weeks :p
 
  • #17
DunceKirchhoff said:
It has no zero in it because the method out the book does not show it. Yes I understand the sum of the voltage around the circuit adds up to zero, but look at the given example there is no use of this. I'm learning on my own so I use whatever method that's in front of me. I been learning physics for like 2 weeks :p

Sorry, I seem to have implied that I didn't already understand what you just said, but again, I suggest that you drop that method and stick to simple loops that are as independent as possible and DO use the "sum to zero" around the loops,.
 
  • #18
Drawing current/voltage loops is a simple approach, but I would probably look for a more intuitive approach in this problem, which takes less than 5 minutes to get an exact answer. I prefer to simplify the resistor network wherever possible (and it's easy to do here). The circuit can be redrawn as the 20V cell in series with two resistances, one 3ohm, the other (10+6)||(2+4)ohm = 16||6ohm. The "||" notation refers to resistors in parallel. The first question is easy to answer after this. The other two questions can then be worked out by figuring out the current in each arm of the circuit (remember that the current is inversely proportional to the resistance in that arm as a proportion of the total effective resistance). Then just use V = IR to work out the p.d. across the resistor they asked for.

BTW, there are some rounding errors in the provided answers.
 
  • #19
Thanks curious, that certainty is a simpler approach
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K