Creating a Mesh with Beam Objects in Anysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter engr86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Mesh
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of creating a mesh using beam objects in Anysis for modeling a 3-D object. Participants explore the requirements for meshing beams, including the necessary commands and geometry definitions, while also addressing the limitations of beam elements in relation to the object's structure.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports an inability to mesh beams in a 3-D object and asks for guidance on achieving this with only beam objects.
  • Another participant provides a detailed example of using the LMESH command along with necessary commands for defining beam elements, suggesting that proper setup is crucial for successful meshing.
  • A participant questions whether the 3-D object is a truss structure, noting that beams can only be meshed to lines and cannot be used for volume or surface objects.
  • Another participant expresses a desire to model a frame with t-bars using 3-D beams and inquires about potentially easier methods.
  • One participant suggests that the method described is likely the easiest and emphasizes the importance of defining keypoints and drawing lines for meshing, while also recommending familiarization with the software's help resources.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of meshing beams on lines and the importance of proper setup. However, there is no consensus on whether there are easier methods for modeling 3-D objects with beams, as some participants emphasize the complexity of the task.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the need for specific geometry definitions and the requirement that beam elements must be meshed to lines, which may restrict the types of 3-D objects that can be modeled effectively.

engr86
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm using anysis to model a 3-d object. I'm using a series of beams. however, when i try to mesh the beams, it says that it's unable to do that. When I add a shell, anysis meshes the model. How do I create a mesh with only beam objects?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BEAM elements must be meshed on lines, using the LMESH command with the proper TYPE, REAL, and SECN set prior. The following is a full example of a static analysis using beam elements
Code:
/prep7

!--insert materials here
SECTYPE,1,BEAM,CSOLID
SECDATA,1.0,8,2

!--define geometry
k,,0,0,0
k,,10,0,0
l,1,2

!--mesh the line
type,1
real,1
secn,1
lmesh,1

!--boundary conditions
ksel,s,kp,,1
nslk
d,all,ux,0.0,,,,uy,uz,rotx,roty,rotz

ksel,s,kp,,2
nslk
f,all,fx,-100

allsel,all
/solu
antype,static
save
solve
save
finish

edit: You can use the command /ESHAPE,1 to turn on the element shaping which allows you to "see" what the beams look like. This can be important when you start using orientation nodes and need to see which way unsymmetric elements are facing. Good luck,
 
When you say a 3-D object, is it a truss structure with lines that are defined in 3-D? Beams can only be meshed to lines; if your object is a volume or surface, you cannot use beam elements to mesh it.
 
I'm trying to model a 3-d object (a frame with t-bars) and I thought that defining 3d beams would be the best way. Is there an easier way?
 
That's probably the easiest way. As mentioned though, you need to line mesh. Put keypoints [K,num,x,y,z] at all the intersections. Then draw lines from keypoint to keypoint [L,kp1,kp2]. Then, you define your sectypes as I mentioned above.

At this point, I'll give the obligatory RTFM for defining beam sections.

At that point, simply LMESH the lines, apply boundary conditions and solve. From the sound of it, you need to spend a few days and just go through the help, do some test cases, get accustomed to the software.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K