dizam
- 22
- 0
If you were to destroy all the air around an object, would that give you a temporary vacuum or would the air be replaced so quickly that it wouldn't make a difference?
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of creating a temporary vacuum by removing air from around an object, particularly in the context of whether the air would rush back in quickly enough to negate the vacuum effect. The scope includes conceptual reasoning and technical explanations related to fluid dynamics and sound propagation.
Participants express differing views on the speed at which air can replace a vacuum and the implications of the object's acceleration, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.
There are assumptions regarding the conditions under which the vacuum is created, such as whether the object is enclosed and the effects of acceleration on airflow, which have not been fully explored or defined.
mathman said:Is the object inside an enclosure? If not, air would come in immediately.
Are you certain that this is true? Could you explain the logic please? So then a supercavitation type of phenomenon would be possible but with a vacuum.mgb_phys said:Well it couldn't come in faster than the speed of sound.
Would you mind elaborating please. Thanksmgb_phys said:Something pretty similair happens to make thunder