If we *had* to make a perfect vacuum....

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Andreas C
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of creating a perfect vacuum, prompted by a fictional alien's challenge. Participants explore the feasibility of achieving a vacuum devoid of atoms, focusing on theoretical and practical approaches, as well as the challenges involved in such an endeavor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that achieving a perfect vacuum might be possible if humanity concentrated its efforts, referencing current vacuum levels of about 100 molecules per cubic centimeter.
  • Another participant proposes using a scaled-up version of a Mercury thermometer, acknowledging that Mercury vapor would still be an issue in the vacuum.
  • A later reply emphasizes the challenges of outgassing from materials used to create the vacuum chamber, arguing that even tiny amounts of trapped gas could compromise the vacuum quality.
  • One participant expresses frustration with the framing of the question, suggesting it could have been posed more straightforwardly without fictional elements, and questions the assumptions about current vacuum technology.
  • Another participant interprets the question as seeking techniques for achieving better vacuums than currently possible, suggesting a need for a separate discussion to address this interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the framing of the question and the feasibility of creating a perfect vacuum. There is no consensus on whether it can be achieved or the methods that might be employed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to material outgassing and the challenges of maintaining a vacuum once achieved. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of the original question and its hypothetical nature.

Andreas C
Messages
196
Reaction score
20
Suppose a green alien came down to Earth in his big spaceship. Suppose that alien was the alien who brought life on Earth and created humanity. Suppose that alien is a bit dissatisfied with us. So basically God, if you're a christian (only green instead). So, what does he do? He asks us to create a perfect vacuum.

"You have a couple of centuries to create a perfect vacuum" he says. "No need for anything fancy, all I care is to have a space at least a tenth of a cubic centimeter that is completely devoid of any atoms, I don't care much about neutrinos and photons and other silly stuff. But it has to remain like that for at least another century, otherwise I'll bring my death beam and kill you all. If you do it, I'll solve world hunger, give you the cure to cancer, tell you the meaning of life and abolish pop up ads".

Yes, I know, "We can't create a perfect vacuum, blah blah blah..." but what if we really had to? And what if we could concentrate all of humanity's efforts on that? According to Wikipedia, concentrations of about 100 molecules per cubic centimeter have already been reached. For a space of 1/10cm^3 it gives us about 10 molecules. I know there are probably many problems other than pumping molecules out that should be addressed, such as diffusion, but these can probably be solved.

So, can it be done? If yes, how?

TL;DR: Make perfect vacuum, how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One approach could be something like a scaled up version of a Mercury thermometer.
The vacuum above the Mercury would i guess have some small but detectable amount of Mercury vapor though.
 
rootone said:
One approach could be something like a scaled up version of a Mercury thermometer.
The vacuum above the Mercury would i guess have some small but detectable amount of Mercury vapor though.

Yes, I thought of that, but the vapor is a big issue...
 
Why can't people ask a simple question like "Can one make a vacuum so good there is less than one molecule per cubic centimeter?" without getting all cutsie-pie and bringing in aliens and death beams and God? If I were to answer a question with green aliens, you'd be annoyed at me for wasting your time.

Andreas C said:
but these can probably be solved.

So you're saying, "I am not a vacuum expert, but I am sure those of you who are aren't doing as well as you could." Do you have any idea how offensive this sounds? Especially coupled with the cutsie. Here's a suggestion - if you want an answer from an expert, don't talk down to them.

Your problem is that you had to build your box out of something. That something will outgas when you start pumping its interior down. When you get to a very good vacuum you can't really pump any more - the pump has nothing left to pump on. Furthermore, you are left with so little gas than any tiny bit of trapped gas will ruin your vacuum. Tiny like the little bits of gas trapped between screw threads. (Which is why you don't use screws)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja
Andreas C said:
...,
So, can it be done? If yes, how?
TL;DR: Make perfect vacuum, how?

I see only one way of interpreting this as a sensible question: you are asking whether there are techniques that might produce better vacuums than we have produced so far, but that we haven't developed for economic reasons. You're constructing a "cost is no objection" hypothetical to eliminate any hypothetical economic objections.

If that's what you're asking, let's start over again in another thread. This one is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander

Similar threads

  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
9K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K