Creating convergent sequences in Banach spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on constructing a sequence \( w_n \) in Banach space \( A \) such that \( w_n \rightarrow 0 \) and \( Tw_n \rightarrow y \) in Banach space \( B \). The linear map \( T: A \rightarrow B \) is not necessarily continuous, complicating the convergence proof. Participants suggest leveraging the properties of metric spaces to control subsequences and recommend using the "without loss of generality" (WLOG) approach to simplify notation and assumptions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Banach spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with linear maps and convergence in metric spaces
  • Knowledge of subsequences and their convergence criteria
  • Basic principles of epsilon-delta definitions in analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of subsequences in metric spaces
  • Learn about the implications of non-continuous linear maps in functional analysis
  • Explore the concept of convergence in Banach spaces
  • Investigate the application of the WLOG principle in mathematical proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of functional analysis, and anyone working with Banach spaces and convergence in metric spaces will benefit from this discussion.

ScroogeMcDuck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry for the rather vague title!

Homework Statement



Given:
  • Two Banach spaces [itex]A[/itex] and [itex]B[/itex], and a linear map [itex]T: A\rightarrow B[/itex]
  • The sequences [itex](x^n_i)[/itex] in A. For each fixed n, [itex](x^n_i) \rightarrow 0[/itex] for [itex]i \rightarrow \infty[/itex].
  • The sequences [itex](Tx^n_i)[/itex] in B. For each fixed n, [itex](Tx^n_i) \rightarrow y_n[/itex] for [itex]i \rightarrow \infty[/itex].
  • The sequence [itex](y_n)[/itex] in B, with [itex]y_n \rightarrow y[/itex] for [itex]n \rightarrow \infty[/itex].

Problem:
I need to create a sequence [itex]w_n[/itex] in A, for which [itex]w_n \rightarrow 0[/itex] and [itex]Tw_n \rightarrow y[/itex] in B.

Homework Equations


So for the sequence [itex]y_n[/itex] of limits of [itex]Tx_i^n[/itex] we know:
[itex]\forall \epsilon>0 \, \exists m \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] such that [itex]\forall n ≥ m: ||y_n - y||<\epsilon[/itex]
And for a fixed n, we know:
[itex]\forall \epsilon>0 \, \exists m_1=m_1(n) \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] such that [itex]\forall n ≥ m_1: ||x_i^n||<\epsilon[/itex]
[itex]\forall \epsilon>0 \, \exists m_2=m_2(n) \in \mathbb{N}[/itex] such that [itex]\forall n ≥ m_2: ||Tx_i^n - y_n||<\epsilon[/itex].

Furthermore T is not necessarily continuous (it would be trivial if it were).

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried using the sequence [itex]w_n = x_n^n[/itex]. Proving that [itex]Tw_n \rightarrow y[/itex] then required me to prove that [itex]\forall \epsilon>0 \, \exists n' \in \mathbb{N} : \forall n≥n': ||Tx_n^n - y_n||< \epsilon/2[/itex] (so that I could use the triangle inequality afterwards), but I couldn't manage this since y_n is not fixed.

I also tried using [itex]w_n = x^n_{m_3(n)}[/itex] where [itex]m_3(n) = max\{m_1(n),m_2(n)\}[/itex]. The required convergence did work out, but then I realized that m_1(n) and m_2(n) depend on [itex]\epsilon[/itex] as well as n, so my sequence depends on [itex]\epsilon[/itex] which is of course not as it should.

Any suggestions, hints, ideas would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So your problem is that you essentially have three sequences, and you need to get some kind of uniform control of them. Passing to subsequences is obviously (?) the way to go, but you're running into trouble with your subsequences being dependent on an arbitrary [itex]\epsilon[/itex].

I suggest using the following fact about metric spaces to get a little better control over your subsequences:

If [itex]u_n\rightarrow u[/itex], then there is [itex]n_1<n_2<...<n_j<...[/itex] such that [itex]d(u_{n_j},u)<j^{-1}[/itex] for all [itex]j=1,2,...[/itex].

I.e. there is always a "nice" subsequence that converges in a controlled way. I think you can use that fact to remove your [itex]\epsilon[/itex] troubles. I'd also suggest making use of the trusty "WLOG" in order to make your notation manageable; since we know we can find a "nice" subsequence, we may as well assume WLOG that the original sequence was already "nice".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K