I Creation and annihilation operator commutation confusion

43arcsec

In Quantum Field Theory by Lancaster, equation 3.14

$$[\hat{a_i},\hat{a_j}^\dagger]=\delta{ij}$$
is introduced as "we define". Yes, example 2.1, where the creation and annihilation operators applied to harmonic operator states, there is a nice simple proof that this is true (although instead of the dirac delta, it's just 1.)

The trouble I am having is that these are operators and they have to operate on something. The identity above says that the commutator must be true no matter what it operates on. Let's say the commutator acts on a single particle in state |i> and for this example, let i=j, so we should get 1. Then we'd have:

$$\hat{a_i}\hat{a_i}^\dagger|i> - \hat{a_i}^\dagger\hat{a_i}|i>$$
After the rightmost operators act we should get:

$$\hat{a_i}|2i> - \hat{a_i}^\dagger|0>$$

Here my |2i> represents a state with 2 particles in state i (there was one there to start, and the creation operator created another). Letting the remaining operators act we should get:

$$|i> - |i> = 0$$

I was expecting 1, not 0.

Thanks for looking.

Related Quantum Physics News on Phys.org

PeterDonis

Mentor
After the rightmost operators act we should get:
Not quite: You are assuming that ${a}^{\dagger}_i | i > = | 2i >$; but actually ${a}^{\dagger}_i | i > = \sqrt{2} | 2i >$. (Make sure you understand why this is the case.) Similarly, $a_i | 2i > = \sqrt{2} | i >$. The two factors of $\sqrt{2}$ applied to the first term should make things work out.

• vanhees71

43arcsec

Got it. Thanks Peter!

"Creation and annihilation operator commutation confusion"

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving