Creation and annihilation operator commutation confusion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the commutation relations of creation and annihilation operators in Quantum Field Theory, specifically referencing equation 3.14 from Lancaster's text. The commutation relation is defined as [\hat{a_i},\hat{a_j}^\dagger]=\delta{ij}, which holds true regardless of the state it operates on. A common confusion arises when applying these operators to specific states, leading to an incorrect expectation of the outcome. The resolution involves recognizing the normalization factors, specifically that \(\hat{a_i}^\dagger | i \rangle = \sqrt{2} | 2i \rangle\) and \(\hat{a_i} | 2i \rangle = \sqrt{2} | i \rangle\), which corrects the initial misunderstanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory principles
  • Familiarity with creation and annihilation operators
  • Knowledge of Dirac notation and quantum states
  • Basic grasp of operator algebra in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of commutation relations in Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about normalization factors in quantum state transformations
  • Explore examples of operator applications on multi-particle states
  • Investigate the implications of commutation relations in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of Quantum Field Theory, and anyone seeking to clarify the application of creation and annihilation operators in quantum mechanics.

43arcsec
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
In Quantum Field Theory by Lancaster, equation 3.14

$$ [\hat{a_i},\hat{a_j}^\dagger]=\delta{ij}$$
is introduced as "we define". Yes, example 2.1, where the creation and annihilation operators applied to harmonic operator states, there is a nice simple proof that this is true (although instead of the dirac delta, it's just 1.)

The trouble I am having is that these are operators and they have to operate on something. The identity above says that the commutator must be true no matter what it operates on. Let's say the commutator acts on a single particle in state |i> and for this example, let i=j, so we should get 1. Then we'd have:

$$ \hat{a_i}\hat{a_i}^\dagger|i> - \hat{a_i}^\dagger\hat{a_i}|i>$$
After the rightmost operators act we should get:

$$ \hat{a_i}|2i> - \hat{a_i}^\dagger|0>$$

Here my |2i> represents a state with 2 particles in state i (there was one there to start, and the creation operator created another). Letting the remaining operators act we should get:

$$|i> - |i> = 0$$

I was expecting 1, not 0.

Thanks for looking.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
43arcsec said:
After the rightmost operators act we should get:

Not quite: You are assuming that ##{a}^{\dagger}_i | i > = | 2i >##; but actually ##{a}^{\dagger}_i | i > = \sqrt{2} | 2i >##. (Make sure you understand why this is the case.) Similarly, ##a_i | 2i > = \sqrt{2} | i >##. The two factors of ##\sqrt{2}## applied to the first term should make things work out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Got it. Thanks Peter!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K