Critical Exponents for Quantum Phase Transitions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the critical exponents for quantum phase transitions (QPTs) in the context of an antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Hamiltonian. It clarifies that while a quantum system in D dimensions maps to a classical system in D + 1 dimensions at zero temperature, finite-size scaling introduces the dynamic critical exponent z, leading to a classification in a D + z classical system. This distinction is crucial for understanding the universality class of QPTs, as the Mermin-Wagner theorem asserts that quantum fluctuations are suppressed at absolute zero, aligning critical exponents with classical transitions in higher dimensions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum phase transitions (QPTs)
  • Familiarity with the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg Hamiltonian
  • Knowledge of critical exponents and their significance
  • Concept of finite-size scaling and dynamic critical exponent (z)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Mermin-Wagner theorem and its implications for quantum systems
  • Explore the relationship between quantum and classical phase transitions in statistical mechanics
  • Investigate dynamic critical exponents and their role in finite-size scaling
  • Review literature on universality classes in quantum phase transitions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in condensed matter physics, particularly those focusing on quantum phase transitions and critical phenomena in quantum systems.

ianyappy
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi All, I'm doing an undergraduate project regarding QPTs for some variation of a AF Heisenberg hamiltonian. I'm a little confused about the change in relations between the critical exponents for a QPT. Some books/papers state that the quantum system in D dimensions is mapped to a classical D + 1 dimension system at T = 0. Yet they also say that in the finite-size scaling laws, we have to change D to D + z, where z is the dynamic critical exponent. So does that mean that the universality class of the QPT is in Some D + z classical system, but beyond the critical parameter, it appears like some D + 1 classical system? Is there some kind of contradiction between these two statements, or am I missing something? I'm afraid I'm not entirely familiar with the subject so I kind of assume universality class and mapping to a new classical system are kind of the same thing. Would appreciate any help with thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statements you mention are actually not contradictory. The mapping from a quantum system to a classical system in one higher dimension refers to the fact that at zero temperature, quantum fluctuations are completely suppressed and the critical exponents characterizing the quantum phase transition are exactly the same as those of a classical phase transition in one higher dimension. This is known as the Mermin-Wagner theorem. However, when considering finite-size scaling in a quantum system, dynamic critical exponents become relevant, which means that the universality class of the quantum phase transition is in some D+z classical system, rather than a D+1 system. Hope this helps!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
849
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K