Criticize diagram of delayed choice quantum eraser

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the creation and critique of a diagram representing the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. Participants are evaluating the clarity and completeness of the diagram in comparison to existing representations, particularly focusing on whether crucial information is omitted or if the diagram is confusing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks feedback on the clarity of their diagram and whether it oversimplifies the experiment, specifically noting the omission of lenses and the actual paths of photons.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the angle at which idler photons travel and its implications for the signal photon, suggesting that omitting prisms and mirrors may lead to confusion.
  • A later reply acknowledges the concern about the angle but shifts focus to the representation of wave behavior, questioning why one side shows spherical waves while the other shows straight paths.
  • One participant proposes adding a visual element (a yellow spark-flicker-bang) to indicate the emergence of photons from the slits, suggesting it may help clarify the diagram despite potentially obscuring the orientation of the slits.
  • Another participant provides a link to an updated version of the diagram in context, indicating ongoing revisions based on feedback.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the clarity and completeness of the diagram, with no consensus reached on whether the current representation adequately conveys the complexities of the experiment.

Contextual Notes

Limitations noted include the omission of certain optical elements (lenses, prisms, mirrors) and the potential confusion arising from the angles of photon travel, which may affect the understanding of the experiment's mechanics.

Strilanc
Science Advisor
Messages
612
Reaction score
229
I'm trying to create a simplified diagram of the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment (contrast with the confusing one on Wikipedia and the simplified one on some random site). Here's what I have so far:

V1oRDj7.png


Context that goes with the diagram: it is understood that an entangled pair of photons emerges from the top slit, the bottom slit, or a superposition thereof. One photon goes left while its entangled partner goes right.

I mainly want to know (a) if the diagram is confusing, and (b) if an oversimplification has removed crucial information that needs to be clarified or called out. For example, in the actual experiment the photons don't really go in opposite directions. Also the diagram omits any lenses. Is that confusing? Misleading? Is the essence still there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think people will wonder why the idler photons going left are traveling at a non-right angle to the screen, and what that implies for the signal photon heading right.
That's the price that is paid for omitting the prisms and mirrors in the original Kim diagram ( or which the wiki version is a reasonable representation).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
andrewkirk said:
I think people will wonder why the idler photons going left are traveling at a non-right angle to the screen, and what that implies for the signal photon heading right.
That's the price that is paid for omitting the prisms and mirrors in the original Kim diagram ( or which the wiki version is a reasonable representation).

That's a good point. (Though I'm surprised you focused on that instead of the mystery of why one side is spherical waves while the other is straight paths.)

I was thinking of putting a yellow spark-flicker-bang over the slits, to show that's where the photons are emerging from. That might help. It would obscure the orientation of the slits (so "why not perpendicular?" might not occur as a thought in the first place), and could help indicate that something non-trivial is happening.
 
Here is an updated version:

nMxtX8i.png


And:

xJD9dGh.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: zonde

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K