Cross product of a vector and its derivative

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the cross product of a vectorized quaternion and its time derivative. The user defines a quaternion as u(t) = (0, u_x(t), u_y(t), u_z(t)) and its derivative as \dot{u}(t) = (0, \dot{u}_x(t), \dot{u}_y(t), \dot{u}_z(t)). The user correctly identifies that the scalar product \dot{u}(t)·u(t) equals zero, but questions the cross product's formulation. Another participant clarifies that the dot product is zero only if the vector maintains a constant length, which is confirmed as the case since these are rotation quaternions on a unit sphere.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quaternion mathematics
  • Knowledge of vector calculus
  • Familiarity with cross and dot products
  • Concept of rotation quaternions on a unit sphere
NEXT STEPS
  • Study quaternion algebra and its applications in 3D rotations
  • Learn about the properties of cross and dot products in vector calculus
  • Explore the implications of quaternion derivatives in physics simulations
  • Investigate the use of quaternions in computer graphics and animation
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, computer graphics developers, and anyone working with 3D rotations and quaternion mathematics.

nburo
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hello guys, this must be a very trivial question, but I just don't see it.

Ihave a "vectorized quaternion" (quaternion with a null scalar part) :

u(t) = (0, u_x(t), u_y(t), u_z(t) )

We also have it's time derivative :

\frac{d}{dt}u(t) = \dot{u}(t) = (0, \dot{u}_x(t), \dot{u}_y(t), \dot{u}_z(t) )

If I'm not mistaken, the scalar product of them should be :

\dot{u}(t)\cdot u(t) = 0

But what would the cross product look like? I know I can write it this way :

\dot{u}(t)\times u(t) = (0, \dot{u}_y(t) u_z(t) - \dot{u}_z(t) u_y(t), \dot{u}_x(t) u_z(t) - \dot{u}_z(t) u_x(t), \dot{u}_x(t) u_y(t) - \dot{u}_y(t) u_x(t) )

Is there a simpler answer? Anything wrong?

Thank you

EDIT : argh, sorry, it's prolly in the wrong subforum
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
nburo said:
Hello guys, this must be a very trivial question, but I just don't see it.

Ihave a "vectorized quaternion" (quaternion with a null scalar part) :

u(t) = (0, u_x(t), u_y(t), u_z(t) )

We also have it's time derivative :

\frac{d}{dt}u(t) = \dot{u}(t) = (0, \dot{u}_x(t), \dot{u}_y(t), \dot{u}_z(t) )

If I'm not mistaken, the scalar product of them should be :

\dot{u}(t)\cdot u(t) = 0
This may be where you are going wrong. The dot product of v and v' is 0 only if v has constant length.

But what would the cross product look like? I know I can write it this way :

\dot{u}(t)\times u(t) = (0, \dot{u}_y(t) u_z(t) - \dot{u}_z(t) u_y(t), \dot{u}_x(t) u_z(t) - \dot{u}_z(t) u_x(t), \dot{u}_x(t) u_y(t) - \dot{u}_y(t) u_x(t) )

Is there a simpler answer? Anything wrong?

Thank you

EDIT : argh, sorry, it's prolly in the wrong subforum
 
HallsofIvy said:
This may be where you are going wrong. The dot product of v and v' is 0 only if v has constant length.

Oh yeah, I'm sorry, I forgot to say that those are rotation quaternions (rotation vector) on a unit sphere, so indeed, the length is constant
 
Last edited:
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K