Cross Section Calc. in Peskin QFT - How to Deal with g^μν.g_μν?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter newgate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Peskin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the unpolarized cross section in Peskin's Quantum Field Theory (QFT) and addresses the handling of terms involving the product of metric tensors, specifically ##g^{\mu \nu}g_{\mu \nu}##. Participants confirm that this product equates to a numerical value, specifically 4, after considering the traces of gamma matrices and the implications of Lorentz indices. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of managing multiple indices and traces in field theory calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with metric tensors and their properties in relativity
  • Knowledge of gamma matrices and their traces
  • Proficiency in tensor notation and manipulation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric tensors in Quantum Field Theory
  • Learn about the calculation of traces in gamma matrix algebra
  • Explore the implications of Lorentz indices in field theory
  • Investigate the role of Kronecker delta in tensor calculations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and anyone engaged in advanced studies of Quantum Field Theory, particularly those focusing on cross section calculations and tensor analysis.

newgate
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I'm doing the calculation of the unpolarized cross section in peskin QFT and i am facing a little obstacle, after the calculation of two traces i get terms containing ##g^{\mu \nu}.g_{\mu \nu}## and my question is how to deal with them? does this product equal to a numerical value?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
newgate said:
does this product equal to a numerical value?
Yes. Are youfamiliar with SR and tensor notation? Do you know what ##g^{\mu\nu}g_{\nu\rho}## would be?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newgate
I think it's equal to ##\delta_{\rho}^{\nu}##...
 
Indeed, so what is the trace of the Kronecker delta?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: newgate
4 but terms containing ##g^{\mu \nu}.g_{\mu \nu}## come after the calculation of traces!
Thanks
 
newgate said:
4 but terms containing ##g^{\mu \nu}.g_{\mu \nu}## come after the calculation of traces!
Thanks
It comes after calculating the traces of gamma matrices whose indices generally are suppressed, this is a trace of the Lorentz indices.
 
Ok Orodrui thank very much :)
 
Just be aware that generally there will be loads of indices and traces which are implicit in field theory (and in particular gauge theory). Lorentz indices, spinor indices, group indices, flavour indices, etc. They may not always be written out but implicit because writing them out explicitly would fill your pages with a mountain of indices.
 
Ok i'll keep that in mind :D Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K