Cubic Polynomials: Solving w/o Rational Roots

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack Diamond
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Polynomials
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around cubic polynomials and the implications of the rational root theorem, particularly in cases where a cubic polynomial may have no rational roots and instead possess complex or imaginary roots. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the nature of roots in cubic equations, especially in relation to the requirement for complex roots to appear in conjugate pairs.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand how a cubic polynomial can lack rational roots while still having three complex or imaginary roots. They question the implications of the rational root theorem and the nature of roots in relation to polynomial degrees.

Discussion Status

Some participants have engaged in clarifying the distinction between rational and real numbers, noting that a cubic polynomial can have real but irrational roots. Others have provided examples to illustrate these points, although there is no explicit consensus on the original poster's confusion regarding the roots of cubic polynomials.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions specific cubic equations that prompted their confusion, and there is an indication of a lack of clarity in the definitions and implications of rational versus real roots. The discussion also reflects on the original poster's experience with their teacher's responses.

Jack Diamond
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I think I saw another thread answer this question, but I was a little lost whilst reading it.
I have just recently learned of the rational root theorem and was using it quite happily; figuring out what possibly answers went with cubic and quartic polynomials gave new meaning to guess and check.
But then I realized something strange, I am aware that, because of conjugates, complex and imaginary solutions to polynomials come in pairs. I am also aware that the amount of roots in a polynomial stem from its degree. This became confusing to me when I came across an equation that was not solved using one of the roots found with the rational root theorem.
I am confused on how it is possible for a cubic polynomial to have no rational roots, and thus, three imaginary or complex roots - even though complex and imaginary numbers must come in pairs.
I asked my teacher, but he did not know.


Homework Equations



This was the equation that spurred the whole confusion:
2x^{3}-5x^{2}-9x+13=0

this is a different one my teacher showed the class after I asked him about it:
2x^{3}-9x^{2}-11x+8=0


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was as simple as a multiplicity. But that wouldn't work. I am really at a lost here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are confusing rational with real. Rational and irrational numbers are both real numbers. So you can have a cubic such as (x-√2)(x-√3)(x-√5)=0, the roots are not rational but all are real.
 
rock.freak667 said:
You are confusing rational with real. Rational and irrational numbers are both real numbers. So you can have a cubic such as (x-√2)(x-√3)(x-√5)=0, the roots are not rational but all are real.

Right. But that also doesn't lead to a polynomial with rational coefficients. How about (x-(-1/2+i*sqrt(3)/2))*(x-(-1/2-i*sqrt(3)/2))*(x-1)=x^3-1? If you want an even more complicated example with three real roots try https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=368349
 
Ooops. Forget my first example. That does have a rational root. Sorry. If you change it to x^3-2 and scale them all by 2^(1/3), then it should be ok.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K