1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Curious Mathematica Result, Evaluating Bell Ineqality

  1. Apr 28, 2010 #1
    Hi guys, first post, sorry if it's in the wrong place. Frequent visitor, you seem to help pretty comprehensively.

    I'm using mathematica to calculate a bell inequality, with a general noisy quantum state. However, when I evaluate it, I get a sequence with an a in the result.. which isn't a declared variable. I'm not really sure what it means, and given the generality of 'a', googling it is pretty much impossible. The question I'm asking is, what on earth is this 'a'? If it was 'i', I'd know how to start looking for a solution, but this is just strange.

    I should be getting a value of 3.414 or so (maximum violation for a quantum state)

    Here's an example of what I'm getting
    Code (Text):
    Evaluate[B1,q=1]
    Sequence[2.28222 + 0.0266136 a, 1]


    2. Relevant equations

    Here's the equations I'm using, if they're at all relevant.
    Code (Text):

    x = ArcTan[q]
    A = (Cos[x/2]^2)/2
    B = (Sin[x/2]^2)/2
    ab00 = A (2 - q)
    ab01 = B (2 - q)
    c = (Cos[x/2] + Sin[x/2])/4
    d = (Cos[x/2] - Sin[x/2])/4
    B1 = ab00 + ab00 + 2 c (q) + 2 q (A) + 2 a (B) + 2 q (d)
     

    3. The attempt at a solution

    No attempted solution, just too confused!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 28, 2010 #2

    kuruman

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    I can't claim to understand exactly what you are doing here, but in the last line should you have two ab00 terms instead of one ab00 and one ab01? If yes, why bother defining ab01?
     
  4. Apr 28, 2010 #3
    The actual terms for the X0Y0 measurements and X0Y1's are the same (hence me using ab00 twice). (edit:) The ab01 is used elsewhere in the calculations, didn't realised I'd copied it twice, by accident.

    It's not the exact terms that's the problem, repetition, whether I've got the Bell Inequality right etc.

    It's why has this 2.0.. + 1.00a, that a, turned up in the answer?
     
  5. Apr 28, 2010 #4
    Haha, nevermind. I typoed the a. Man I'm stupid for not checking that. Sorry for wasting your time there :]
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Curious Mathematica Result, Evaluating Bell Ineqality
  1. Bell's Theorem Problem (Replies: 2)

  2. Bell's inequality (Replies: 1)

Loading...