1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Curling stone coming to rest - friction

  1. May 31, 2010 #1
    This is just a revision question for an exam i have in a couple weeks.

    I think i kow the answer but just want to double check.

    a curling stone is released with an instial speed of 3.1 m/s
    the coefficent of sliding friction between the stone and ice is 0.017
    What is the distance the stone will come to rest?
    A 14m B 19m C 29m D 58m E Impossible to tell without mass



    I believe it to be E

    IF i did have the mass what equation would i need?
    [tex]\mu[/tex][tex]_{}slide[/tex] * mg ??


    Many thanks
     
    Last edited: May 31, 2010
  2. jcsd
  3. May 31, 2010 #2
    Re: friction

    you sure ? If a ton of steel is on a ice and I push it to give it a momentum, will it stop at the same place than a curling stone of 10kg ?

    Think about it.
     
  4. May 31, 2010 #3
    Re: friction

    btw it was a joke. You had it almost right :P

    coefficient of dynamics friction * Force which equals Mass times Acceleration.
     
  5. May 31, 2010 #4
    Re: friction

    ok re-looked at it and have decided on D 58m as D=V2/the coefficent of sliding friction * gravity (9.8 m/s)

    That look correct?
     
  6. May 31, 2010 #5
    Re: friction

    How can you tell the acceleration ? (which is negative) you conclude it is the gravity ?
     
  7. May 31, 2010 #6
    Re: friction

    well the equation i have is D=V2/[tex]\mu[/tex]slide * g

    I just put in my values of 3.1 m/s2/ 0.017*9.8 m/s

    It gave me an answer of 57.6 which is the same as answer D 58m (2sf)
     
  8. May 31, 2010 #7
    Re: friction

    I already told you you were right.

    It's just my way to teach. To make sure you understood and looked at your response again to be sure.
     
  9. May 31, 2010 #8
    Re: friction

    ha ha oh right, ok thanks
    Do you know much about collisions in three dimensions between 2 objects? i.e (vbx,vby)?
    :)
     
  10. May 31, 2010 #9
    Re: friction

    It's the same thing then between two objects in 2 dimensions. You just add another dimension.

    You seperate the forces in x, y, z instead of only x and y. That's it.
     
  11. May 31, 2010 #10
    Re: friction

    sorry ive been an idiot, i meant in 2 dimensions.
    ill tell you the question....

    2 objects with masses A 0.60kg and B 0.45kg are travelling towards one another parallel and anti parallel at uAx 1.5m/s and uBx -2.0m/s
    the velocity of A after collision is (0,12)m/s what is (vBx,vBy) of B after collision?

    I just cant find in my text how to do it for (x,y)
     
  12. May 31, 2010 #11
    Re: friction

    Hint: 3rd law of Newton.
     
  13. May 31, 2010 #12
    Re: friction

    so if object A has an opposite but equal in magnitude force on object B when they collide then the force acting on B would be f=ma which would be 0.9N, if i rearrnged to find for v i get v=f/m which gives me 2m/s but as B is travelling at -2m/s it would reusult in 0m/s so B would come to a stand still and have (vBx,vBy) (0,0)m/s

    is that sort of the way to go?
     
  14. May 31, 2010 #13
    Re: friction

    You "can" do it that way. But the best way is to go with the 3rd law of newton: the conservation of energy.

    Or I may say, the momentum. m1 x v1 = m2 x v2
     
  15. May 31, 2010 #14
    Re: friction

    yer i was going to ask if there was a better way of doing it. That makes sense :) Thanks
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Curling stone coming to rest - friction
Loading...