Curvature/centrifugal force problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter TroyWeathers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves calculating the radius of curvature of a banked track for a train moving at 50 m/s, where a passenger experiences a weight increase of 10% due to centripetal acceleration. The correct approach requires recognizing that the centripetal force is provided by the horizontal component of the normal force, not centrifugal force. The final answer for the radius of curvature is 556 meters, achieved by applying the correct equations of motion and forces acting on the passenger.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its relation to circular motion
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion, particularly Newton's second law
  • Familiarity with basic trigonometry for resolving forces
  • Concept of weight and how it changes under acceleration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of centripetal acceleration and its applications in circular motion
  • Learn how to resolve forces using trigonometric functions in inclined planes
  • Explore the relationship between normal force and apparent weight in non-inertial frames
  • Investigate the effects of banking angles on vehicle dynamics in curved tracks
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding dynamics of motion on curved paths.

TroyWeathers
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I am stuck on a problem that seems so very simple, but I can not get the correct answer on this. I would appreciate anyone who would solve this and/or tell me what I am doing wrong. Sometimes I make stupid mistakes. I know it is probably simple, but just hit a wall on this one.

Problem:A train is running smootly on a curved track at the rate of 50 m/s. A passenger standing on a set of scales observes that his weight is 10% greater than when the train is at rest. The track is banked so that the force acting on the passenger is normal to the floor of the train. What is the radius of curvature of the track?

I am told the final correct answer is 556m.

My attempt is this : Centrifugal force = mg

So, since he is 10% more weight than at rest I have: mg + .10mg = mv^2/r. where m = mass, g= acceleration due to gravity, and r= the radius of the track.

1.1mg = mv^2/r. The masses cancel giving 1.1g = v^2/r. Solving for r gives:

r= v^2/1.1g, which gives me 231.9m for r which isn't correct. Where have I went wrong? Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TroyWeathers said:
Hey everyone,

I am stuck on a problem that seems so very simple, but I can not get the correct answer on this. I would appreciate anyone who would solve this and/or tell me what I am doing wrong. Sometimes I make stupid mistakes. I know it is probably simple, but just hit a wall on this one.

Problem:A train is running smootly on a curved track at the rate of 50 m/s. A passenger standing on a set of scales observes that his weight is 10% greater than when the train is at rest. The track is banked so that the force acting on the passenger is normal to the floor of the train. What is the radius of curvature of the track?

I am told the final correct answer is 556m.

My attempt is this : Centrifugal force = mg
This is wrong. What you are looking for is the centripetal force which acts horizontally toward the center of the curve. There are just 2 forces acting on the car, the weight, which acts vertically down, and the normal force (the scale reading), which acts perpendicular to the banked rails.
So, since he is 10% more weight than at rest I have: mg + .10mg = mv^2/r. where m = mass, g= acceleration due to gravity, and r= the radius of the track.

1.1mg = mv^2/r. The masses cancel giving 1.1g = v^2/r. Solving for r gives:

r= v^2/1.1g, which gives me 231.9m for r which isn't correct. Where have I went wrong? Thanks for the help!
It is the horizontal component of the Normal force that provides the centripetal force. You should be able to get that with some trig by using Newton 1 in the vertical y direction, and the centripetal force equation (Newton 2) in the horizontal x direction.
 
Thank you very much. I was making it too simple. That's weird because I usually make things way too hard. I will take a look at it and rework it. Thank you again very much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K