Curve Parametrization: Minimum Parameters for Unique Point Specification

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TrickyDicky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Parametrization
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the minimum number of parameters required to uniquely specify a point on a curved line, exploring concepts of parametrization, embedding in Euclidean spaces, and the relationship between parameters and coordinates. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to geometry and topology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that one parameter is sufficient to specify a point on a curved line, particularly in a topological sense.
  • Others argue that when considering the embedding of curves in Euclidean spaces, additional parameters may be necessary, such as the radius of curvature for a circle.
  • A participant points out that while a circle can be described using a single parameter (t), this may conflate parameters with coordinates, as two coordinates are needed to describe a point in \mathbb{R}^2.
  • Another participant mentions that for a curved manifold of a given dimension, n+1 coordinates may be needed for embedding in Euclidean space, but acknowledges that this is not universally true.
  • One participant references the Whitney embedding theorem, noting that while every smooth n-dimensional manifold can be embedded in \mathbb{R}^{2n}, specific cases may allow for fewer coordinates.
  • There is a question raised about using curvature as an additional coordinate in the context of intrinsically curved surfaces embedded in three-dimensional space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between parameters, coordinates, and the requirements for specifying points on curved lines and manifolds. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in their understanding and the complexity of the concepts discussed, particularly regarding the distinction between parameters and coordinates, as well as the implications of embedding in different dimensional spaces.

TrickyDicky
Messages
3,507
Reaction score
28
What is the minimum number of parameters needed to uniquely specify a point in a curved line?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One?

What are you trying to get at?
 
Ben Niehoff said:
One?

What are you trying to get at?

I have some concepts muddled and I'm trying to clear them up.
I know that topologically is enough with one parameter since bending is ignored, but if we write the line element of say a circle I would say that since we must embed it in a plane it should require two parameters: one plus the radius of curvature but I'm not sure. Maybe there is an intuitive way to understand this.
 
Last edited:
A circle can be described as (cos(t),sin(t)). So it requires only one parameter, namely t...
 
micromass said:
A circle can be described as (cos(t),sin(t)). So it requires only one parameter, namely t...

Yes, maybe I'm conflating parameters with coordinates, you just used a pair of numbers to define a point in the circle.
 
Well, to describe a point in \mathbb{R}^2, you'll need two values. So to describe a curve you'll need 2 coordinates. If that's what you're getting at.
 
micromass said:
Well, to describe a point in \mathbb{R}^2, you'll need two values. So to describe a curve you'll need 2 coordinates. If that's what you're getting at.

Basically what I was thinking is that for every curved manifold of a given dimension (one in the case of the circle), one needs n+1 coordinates to describe it in terms of the Euclidean embedding space, right?
But since the curvature is intrinsic it shouldn't need to be embedded, (locally it would be Euclidean) so what is the line element of a circle with one coordinate?
 
anybody there? Did I ask wrong?
 
TrickyDicky said:
Basically what I was thinking is that for every curved manifold of a given dimension (one in the case of the circle), one needs n+1 coordinates to describe it in terms of the Euclidean embedding space, right?

This is certainly not true in general. It happens to be true for 1-dimensional manifolds though.
Take the Klein bottle for example, this has dimension 2, but one needs 4 coordinates to describe it, i.e. it can only be embedded in \mathbb{R}^4.

In general, take a look at the Whitney embedding theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_embedding_theorem
which states that every smooth n-dimensional manifold can be embedded in \mathbb{R}^{2n}. One cannot do better in general, although in some specific cases we can.
 
  • #10
micromass said:
This is certainly not true in general. It happens to be true for 1-dimensional manifolds though.
Take the Klein bottle for example, this has dimension 2, but one needs 4 coordinates to describe it, i.e. it can only be embedded in \mathbb{R}^4.

In general, take a look at the Whitney embedding theorem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitney_embedding_theorem
which states that every smooth n-dimensional manifold can be embedded in \mathbb{R}^{2n}. One cannot do better in general, although in some specific cases we can.
You are right of course, I wasn't very precise, thanks for the reference.

My point was that if we have a curved manifold, say a two-sphere embedded in a 3-space, its line element may have 3 coordinates, but locally it will have a Euclidean form, a local chart with dimension 2, is this right?
 
  • #11
TrickyDicky said:
What is the minimum number of parameters needed to uniquely specify a point in a curved line?

If a proper parametrization exists, then one if your object is a line, no matter how many dimensions that curve is embedded in.

For arbitrary objects, finding an analytical parametrization is pretty damn hard though.
 
  • #12
chiro said:
If a proper parametrization exists, then one if your object is a line, no matter how many dimensions that curve is embedded in.
Sure, I was mixing there parameters, coordinates and dimensions.
 
  • #13
If we had for instance an intrinsically curved surface, could we use the curvature parameter as a third coordinate in a 3-space embedding?
(Sorry if this is very basic stuff for you guys, I'm not sure where I should post this kind of questions.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K