Curved space and curvilinear coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between curvilinear coordinates in Euclidean space and the embedding of curved spaces into Euclidean space. Curvilinear coordinates are utilized to describe the Euclidean space itself, while embeddings typically involve lower-dimensional manifolds. The conversation emphasizes that Euclidean local coordinates cannot be introduced in a curved space and that curvilinear coordinates define both tangent and normal components in curved spaces. Participants recommend studying the definition of manifolds to gain a clearer understanding of these concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of curvilinear coordinates
  • Familiarity with manifolds and their properties
  • Knowledge of tangent and normal spaces in differential geometry
  • Basic concepts of Euclidean space and its dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definition and properties of manifolds in differential geometry
  • Learn about tangent and normal spaces in the context of curved surfaces
  • Explore the mathematical framework of embeddings in higher-dimensional spaces
  • Investigate the applications of curvilinear coordinates in physics and engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are interested in understanding the geometric concepts of curvilinear coordinates and manifolds.

mertcan
Messages
343
Reaction score
6
hi, I really wonder what the difference between curvilinear coordinates in a Euclidean space and embedding a curved space into Euclidean space is ? They resemble to each other for me, so Could you explain or spell out the difference? Thanks in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An embedding is usually of a lower-dimensional manifold. Curvilinear coordinates are used to describe the Euclidean space itself.
 
You can not introduce Euclidian local coordinates in a curved space
 
I think curvilinear coordinates generally define tangent space, but in curved space also defines normal component besides the tangent space. Am I right? I saw some close definition like this. Is it true?
 
why do not you study the definition of the manifold first?
 
By definition the Euclidean coordinates are the local coordinates ##x^i## on a manifold such that ##\nabla_i\equiv \frac{\partial }{\partial x^i}##
 
mertcan said:
I think curvilinear coordinates generally define tangent space, but in curved space also defines normal component besides the tangent space. Am I right? I saw some close definition like this. Is it true?
No. You have several threads hinting that you are reading a text which presents manifolds in general through their embedding into a higher dimensional Euclidean space. The general definition of a manifold and its tangent space does not require this. I suggest that you pick up a reference where manifolds are treated properly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 127 ·
5
Replies
127
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K