Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

CVT efficiency

  1. Apr 4, 2009 #1
    I wonder what's the best efficiency that's possible to achieve with a continously variable transmission. i've googled a lot and can't find anything useful (with useful i mean an approximate value in [%]).
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 5, 2009 #2
    The following web site has a good discussion of the various types of continuusly variable transmissions (CVTs)
    None of the CVTs have efficiencies as high as manual transmissions: about 96% in all but the 1:1 gear which is about 98%. Manufactirers of CVTs will not disclose the efficiencies of their designs; it is proprietary.

    Note that manual transmissions in standard automobiles do not require water cooling. If a particular CVT requires water cooling, that is proof that it is less efficient than a manual transmission.
  4. Apr 7, 2009 #3
    yes, i've seen this page. i've read quite a lot of stuff regarding cvt's, but never found anything like efficiency.

    are you sure it's 96 to 98%?
    i was told in school a pair of gearwheels has 99% efficiency; either i was told wrong or efficiency of standard transmission should also be around 98%. there's still some friction in those things.

    cars with cvt's should have 5-10% lower fuel consumption, but they either have the same or even higher than cars with standard gearboxes. i don't think that this 2% difference would make such an impact on fuel consumption.

    anyway, i don't know where, on well-made pair of gears, 2% could be lost... :)
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2009
  5. Apr 7, 2009 #4
    I found a measurement (see attachment) that shows that a 5 speed manual in passenger cars has an efficiency of about 96% in gears 1,2,3,and 5, and an efficiency of about 98% in 4th (1:1) gear. Recall that the input and output shafts are co-aligned, so that in gears 1,2,3, and 5 there are two gear-to-gear contacts. As in other transmissions, the efficiencies depend on both RPM and torque.

    Attached Files:

  6. Apr 8, 2009 #5
    This article gives a loss of 8% (page 11). There is more than one type of CVT and some systems gain overall better efficiency by allowing the ICE to run at a more efficient RPM and get overall lower emissions.
    http://www.torotrak.com/Resources/Torotrak/IQPC_2008.pdf [Broken]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  7. Apr 11, 2009 #6
    thanks a lot for this data, means a lot to me, really.
  8. Apr 11, 2009 #7
    For engine brake power output less than the power at the power corresponding to the maximum efficiency ("sweet spot" usually about 35% of redline and 80% of maximum torque), the maximum efficiency for a given power output is usually about 50% to 80% of maximum torque and a lower RPM than the "sweet spot". Cruising at city speeds usually requires about 10 kW or less. and should not require running above about 30% of redline. IF a CVT HAS WATER COOLING, then it is less efficient than a manual transmission (typ 96% to 98%).
    Review this paper for the physics and eficiency of automobile engines
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  9. Oct 30, 2009 #8
    http://www.zeroshift.com/pdf/Seamless%20AMT%20Offers%20Efficient%20Alternative%20To%20CVT.pdf [Broken]
    http://www.zeroshift.com/pdf/Seamless%20AMT%20Offers%20Efficient%20Alternative%20To%20CVT.pdf" [Broken]

    Manual - 97%
    Automatic - 86%
    CVT belt - 88%
    CVT torroidal - 93%
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  10. Oct 30, 2009 #9
    yes! that's what i was looking for, thanks!
  11. Oct 30, 2009 #10
    Where is a comparison to the efficiency of the planetary CVT used in the Prius. The Prius CVT is unique in that it allows both an electric motor and a gasoline engine to simultaneously drive the vehicle in forward direction (but only electric motor in reverse).
    Bob S
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2009
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook