Cyclic abelian group of order pq

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of a cyclic abelian group of order pq, where p and q are distinct primes and relatively prime. It is established that if G is an abelian group with elements a and b such that |a|=p and |b|=q, then G is cyclic because |ab|=pq. The necessity of the abelian condition is confirmed, as demonstrated by the counterexample of the non-abelian group S3, which has order 6. Additionally, it is noted that if p does not divide q-1, G is abelian and thus cyclic.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically cyclic and abelian groups.
  • Familiarity with the order of elements in a group.
  • Knowledge of prime numbers and their properties.
  • Basic understanding of counterexamples in mathematical proofs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the structure of finite groups, focusing on groups of order pq.
  • Learn about the classification of groups based on their order and properties.
  • Investigate the implications of Sylow's theorems in group theory.
  • Explore the relationship between group abelian properties and their cyclic nature.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theory enthusiasts, and students tackling advanced algebra exercises.

guildmage
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
I'm looking at the exercises of Hungerfod's Algebra. Some looks easy but it seems the proofs are not so obvious. Here's one I'm particularly having a hard time solving:

Let G be an abelian group of order pq with (p,q)=1. Assume that there exists elements a and b in G such that |a|= p and |b| = q. Show that G is cyclic.

Help anyone?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the order of ab?
 
Oh yeah. |ab|=pq because p and q are relatively prime. Whice means ab will generate the whole of G. And hence G is cyclic. Thanks.
 
For this problem, in order for the group G to be cyclic, is the abelian condition necessary? In other words, if the problem is restated as: "if a finite group of order pq, where p and q are distinct primes, the the group is cyclic", is it still true?

The reason I asked this question is that in my proof, I didn't see why we need the group to be abelian. Thanks!
 
It's absolutely necessary. Consider the permutation group on three letters (ie. S3), then this is a group of order 6 = 2 *3 and is clearly not cyclic (and definitely not abelian either). However we do have this result:

If G is a group order pq, pq distinct primes say P < q and p does not divide q-1, then G is abelian, hence cyclic. The hard part is proving it's abelian and the cyclic part follows from your initial problem.

There's also a bit more interesting of a problem:

If G is a group of order pq as above and p does q-1, then G is the unique nonabelian group of order pq.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
645
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
974
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K