Cylindrical Conductors Carrying a Current I -- Formula (?)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding a formula for cylindrical conductors carrying a current. It suggests modeling the conductor as if it has a full current throughout, while considering the effects of cavities that would carry an opposing current. Participants emphasize that in real-life scenarios, current flows on the outer surface of the conductor, and a uniform current distribution should be assumed for calculations. The conversation includes a mathematical expression using TeX markup to illustrate the relationship between the parameters involved. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the theoretical approach to modeling current in cylindrical conductors.
requied
Messages
98
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The current through the cylindrical conductor s I. Its cross sectional area is pi.a^2. Now, the two cavities on the figure above can be thought of as conductors carrying a current I' into the plane of the paper, where;
Relevant Equations
I'= [I/(pi.a^2)].pi.[a/2]^2
1592927337236.png

1592927385542.png


How can I' be the formula above? Is there any formula to get this same
1592927476652.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The suggested path is to treat the situation as if you had a full current in the entire big conductor without the cavities, and then add in the effect of having an additional current going the other way where the cavities should be.

Did you try that?

IRL the current would be on the outer surface of the conductor ... it looks like you are supposed to model the current as uniform through the conductor (check).

Note: you can use TeX markup for equations ...

$$\frac{1}{\pi a^2}\pi \left(\frac{a}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{4}$$

The code fopr that was
Code:
$$\frac{1}{\pi a^2}\pi \left(\frac{a}{2}\right)^2 = \frac{1}{4}$$
 
So is there some elegant way to do this or am I just supposed to follow my nose and sub the Taylor expansions for terms in the two boost matrices under the assumption ##v,w\ll 1##, then do three ugly matrix multiplications and get some horrifying kludge for ##R## and show that the product of ##R## and its transpose is the identity matrix with det(R)=1? Without loss of generality I made ##\mathbf{v}## point along the x-axis and since ##\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{w} = 0## I set ##w_1 = 0## to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K