D=E/pi does this equation explain gravity and more?

In summary, a Lethbridge student has proposed a new theory stating that D=distance and D=E/pi. This theory explains gravity by suggesting that light waves experience a greater distance on one side of an object, causing them to bend and change direction. The theory also offers an explanation for strong nuclear force and black holes. While the student and other physicists are still working to prove or disprove this theory, the validity of the idea is uncertain due to its lack of publication in a reputable physics journal. Therefore, this type of discussion is not allowed on this platform.
  • #1
PRyckman
134
0
"Lethbridge student solves Universe"
in todays local paper.

A young lad has postulated that D=distance
D=E/pi

The theory on how it explains gravity is that if distance is altered by E then a beam of light traveling around say the sun would encounter a greater distance on one side of the wave than on the other.

Since the wave travels at a constant of c and one one side the distance to be traveled is greater then one side of the wave would take longer to pass than the other causing it to bend and change its direction.

In an atom a sub atomic particle would spend more time on one side of the atom than on the other thus causing the entire atom to move in that direction.

The theory on how it explains strong nuclear force is a little more involved but just as plausible,

If the equation were to become a negative (negative value for pi) then instead of things being pulled to the center of something they would be pushed, and instead of the force getting stronger the farther in the force would stronger the farther out.

The equation goes on to explain black holes a little more complex yet but again still understandable at first glance.

With this equation giving a relative value for distance and E=mc2 giving a relative value for time a velocity can be created by factoring the two.
if the product of relative distance and relative time were greater than light speed relative to us then light could not ever reach us at the observation point and a black hole would be observed.

At this point myself and other physicists at the local university are figuring out ways to prove or disprove the theory but so far have only been sucessful at finding more ways to prove it.

I'd like to hear what others have to think about the idea, hope to hear from you soon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
We really discourage discussion like this.

Unless you have a specific citation on which physics journal this has been published, I'm sure you will see that a discussion on this will not be anything meaningful. This is because (i) we will have to rely on your reporting of a newspaper report (3rd hand news), and (ii) we really don't have an exact idea of what actually has been done. We also do not know if this is crackpottery, or something really legitimate - your local newspaper isn't a physics journal and may even have a section on horroscopes.

If you have a specific, exact citation, then let me know and I'll reopen this thread. If not, this type of discussion doesn't belong here per our Guidelines.

Zz.
 
  • #3


The equation D=E/pi certainly raises interesting questions about gravity and its potential connections to other phenomena in the universe. It is always exciting to see young minds exploring new ideas and pushing the boundaries of our understanding.

However, it is important to note that this equation is just a theory at this point and has not been scientifically proven. While it may have potential, it is essential to subject it to rigorous testing and peer review before claiming it as a solution to the mysteries of the universe.

As for the Lethbridge student who came up with this theory, it is commendable that they are actively engaged in scientific inquiry and pushing the boundaries of knowledge. I hope that they continue to explore their ideas and contribute to the scientific community in the future.

In the meantime, it is important to approach this equation with caution and continue to explore other theories and explanations for gravity and the workings of the universe. Only through thorough research and experimentation can we truly understand the mysteries of the universe.
 

1. What is the meaning of the equation D=E/pi and how does it relate to gravity?

The equation D=E/pi is known as the Schwarzschild radius, which is a concept in Einstein's theory of general relativity. It represents the radius at which a massive object would need to be compressed to become a black hole. This equation does not directly explain gravity, but it is related to the effects of gravity on massive objects.

2. Can this equation be used to calculate the gravitational force between objects?

No, the equation D=E/pi does not directly calculate the gravitational force between objects. It is used to determine the radius at which an object would become a black hole due to gravity.

3. Is D=E/pi a fundamental constant in physics?

No, D=E/pi is not a fundamental constant in physics. It is a mathematical concept derived from Einstein's theory of general relativity.

4. Are there any real-world applications of this equation?

Yes, the concept of the Schwarzschild radius has been used in astrophysics to study the properties of black holes. It has also been used in theoretical physics to explore the effects of extreme gravity on space and time.

5. Does this equation hold true in all situations and environments?

The Schwarzschild radius equation is based on the assumptions of Einstein's theory of general relativity, which has been extensively tested and shown to accurately describe gravity in most scenarios. However, it may not hold true in extreme situations such as near the singularity of a black hole or in the presence of quantum effects.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
819
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
451
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
593
Back
Top