D'Alambertian operator on the heaviside function?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
Dixanadu
Messages
250
Reaction score
2
Hey guys,

How does one compute the following quantity:

[itex]\Box \theta(x_{0})=\partial_{0}\partial^{0}\theta(x_{0})[/itex]?

I know that [itex]\partial_{0}\theta(x_{0})=\delta(x_{0})[/itex] which is the Dirac delta, but what about the second derivative?

Thanks everyone!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Heaviside and Dirac delta are examples of distributions. They are a kind of generalized function, and only defined by their action on some "test function" in an inner-product. Integrals satisfy the properties of inner products, so choosing some smooth function [itex]\varphi (x)[/itex] that vanishes at infinity, we have,
[tex]\int \partial_x\delta(x)\varphi(x) dx = -\int \delta(x) \partial_x \varphi(x) dx = -\partial_x\varphi(0)[/tex]
using integration by parts.

So the action of the distribution [itex]\partial_x^2 \theta(x)[/itex] on a smooth function [itex]\varphi(x)[/itex] produces [itex]-\partial_x\varphi(0)[/itex]
 
hmm but my situation involves no integrals - basically I'm trying to compute the following:

[itex]\Box [\theta(x_{0})\phi(x)\phi^{\dagger}(0)][/itex]

where [itex]\phi, \phi^{\dagger}[/itex] are solutions to the complex Klein-Gordon equation.

I've been told that [itex]\partial^{0}\theta(x_{0})=\partial_{0}\theta(x_{0})=\delta(x_{0})[/itex]. I'm not sure how this matches up to what you said above?
 
That product is mathematically ill-defined, because you have a multiplication of 3 distributions. In the so-called classical theory of distributions, there's no way to 'multiply' them.
As a note (rumor), I heard that Colombeau's theory of distributions somehow addresses this issue.