What is the method for calculating the dampening of thermal oscillations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the 1D heat equation using separation of variables, specifically addressing the dampening of thermal oscillations in ground temperature modeling. The participant derived the general solution as T(x,t) = f(x) × g(t), with f(x) involving sine and cosine functions and g(t) representing an exponential decay. They explored boundary conditions, including a periodic condition at the surface and a constant temperature at depth, and referenced a paper that describes the magnitude of thermal oscillations decreasing in proportion to e^(-x/d_p). The participant seeks clarification on the calculation of dampening and the use of periodic boundary conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the 1D heat equation and its mathematical formulation.
  • Familiarity with separation of variables technique in solving partial differential equations.
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions and their implications in thermal modeling.
  • Basic concepts of thermal conductivity and oscillation theory.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the dampening factor in thermal oscillations, specifically e^(-x/d_p).
  • Study periodic boundary conditions in the context of heat equations and their applications.
  • Explore literature on heat functions and their mathematical representations, particularly in relation to seasonal temperature variations.
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving the 1D heat equation with complex boundary conditions.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers involved in thermal analysis, particularly those modeling ground temperature variations and studying heat transfer dynamics.

James Brady
Messages
106
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I am attempting to solve the 1 d heat equation using separation of variables.

1d heat equation:

##\frac{\partial T}{\partial t} = \alpha \frac{\partial^2 T}{\partial x^2}##

I used the standard separation of variables to get a solution. Without including boundary conditions right now, the solutions are:

##T(x,t) = f(x) \times g(t)##

where

##f(x) = A_1(sin(\sqrt{\lambda} x) + cos(\sqrt{\lambda} x))## and
##g(t) = A_1 e^{-\lambda \alpha t}##

other terms:
##\alpha =## thermal conductivity
##\lambda =## some constant (solved for in boundary conditions)
##A_1 =## some constant

I've worked through and have a decent grasp on many of the fixed boundary conditions solutions for this problem. I'm trying to model ground temperature with increasing depth, so I know need to have a periodic boundary condition at the surface to represent seasons and then constant temperature deep underground.

Boundary conditions:

##T(0,t) = T_0 + Asin(\frac{2 \pi t}{365} )## (ground surface)

##T(\infty, t) = T_0 ##

##\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{d T}{d x} = 0 ##

This paper gave the magnitude of thermal oscillations as decreasing in proportion to ##e^\frac{-x}{d_p}## where ##d_p = \sqrt{\alpha t_p/\pi}## is the period depth, t_p is the period time (365 days). I'm not sure how he got that decaying exponential, some kind of coefficient, but I haven't dealt with periodic boundary conditions before and it looks like he didn't use numerical methods to get this one?

Any idea how he was able to calculate the dampening of oscillations??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try T = T0 + Aei(ωt-βx)e-αx
 
Oh, and it's "damping". "Dampening" means making moist.
 
I've been playing with that solution for the past couple of days, a couple insights:
  • The method of separation of variables as described here won't work. The solution you provided has an x component in the imaginary exponential term as well as a time component, so it's not two independent functions multiplied.
  • The general form looks good although I know it can't be a diffusivity term on the last part, the units need to work out to be dimensionless. I guess according to Eskilson it's ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \alpha / \omega}}##, just not sure how he got that.
I see now how it's required to get that beta term in the sinusoidal function, it accounts for the fact that heat lags behind the wave on the surface. Do you know of any literature I can look into regarding heat functions like this?

Also thank you for the grammatical correction. =)
 
@Nidum looks like that'll be a lot of fun :ok:. Thanks, appreciate it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K