Dangers at the World's Deepest Cave

  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dangers associated with Veryovkina Cave, the world's deepest cave at 7,257 feet (2,212 meters). Participants highlight the severe water hazards, including flooding from surface rain and the complexities of modeling water dynamics in such a deep vertical shaft. A tragic incident is noted where a caver died due to exhaustion after descending 3,000 feet without adequate equipment, specifically lacking ascender stirrups. The conversation emphasizes the critical need for safety measures and the potential for advanced modeling of water behavior in extreme cave environments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spelunking and cave exploration safety
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics, particularly in vertical shafts
  • Knowledge of climbing equipment, specifically ascender systems
  • Basic principles of pressure and air dynamics in confined spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced fluid dynamics modeling techniques for vertical shafts
  • Study safety protocols for spelunking and cave rescue operations
  • Explore the physics of terminal velocity in varying geometries
  • Investigate the design and functionality of climbing ascender systems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for spelunkers, cave explorers, safety trainers, and researchers in fluid dynamics and climbing equipment design.

Messages
15,615
Reaction score
10,394
TL;DR
The dangers of caving at the world's deepest cave.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, jim mcnamara, OmCheeto and 1 other person
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Maybe you could post a summary?
 
Yes, the video talks about the deepest cave found so far at 7000 ft and about folks who have ventured there, and the water hazards they faced. A small amount of surface rain produced torrents of water flooding the cave system.
 
Dang. You wouldn't catch me in there. 7257 feet (2212 m) deep.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto
I was just watching some videos and looking up some information on Veryovkina Cave a few days ago. Interesting that this video was posted soon after lol.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
dlgoff said:
Dang. You wouldn't catch me in there. 7257 feet (2212 m) deep.
I'll second that. Visualize water falling down a vertical shaft. It would not be isolated drops. so I'm not sure what the terminal velocity would be. Whatever, it sounds pretty fatal to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff
I've been trying to imagine modeling the water falling in that 2000 m deep cave. The complexities make my head hurt, even for the simplified case with a smooth vertical shaft.
1661184340064.png

  • As the stream of water falls down, there must be a current of air flowing up. There would be a boundary layer and a core layer in the water stream.
  • Terminal velocity of independent falling drops would not apply. I don't know how to calculate terminal velocity for this geometry.
  • Would the tip of the water stream be bullet shaped, as in a river, or mushroom shaped?
    1661183806251.png
    1661183847210.png
  • A critical parameter is the difference in shaft radius Rs, and water stream radius Rw. Imagine an annular shape for the rising air. As (Rs-Rw) approaches zero, the falling stream becomes a piston compressing the air below, and decelerating the water.
  • Air below the water would be compressed. For a shaft that deep, fantastic pressures in the range of 100-200 bar are possible. Might the rising air even go supersonic?
  • Energy stored compressing the air would rebound. That might cause the falling water to reverse direction and become a geyser. It could even be oscillatory.
    1661183913602.png
  • The rising air might take the form of bubbles, rather than a continuous annular flow. The whole thing might resemble gurgling water coming out of an upside down bottle.
    1661184051657.png
It sounds like the magnitude of comprehensive modeling exploring the full range of parameters, might be a PhD thesis, or even a lifetime of work. It might be thankless work because few people other than spelunkers would be interested.

But one thing is abundantly clear without models. It is amazing that nobody died in this incident.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith, Wrichik Basu and dlgoff
Actually, someone did die. In a separate incident, a lone caver went in and couldn't get out.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...h-worlds-deepest-cave-reclaimed-team-100.html

He's mentioned in the video I posted in another thread where they said he had descended about 3000ft into the cave and was stopped when he realized he couldn't get past the water issues below.

While he had hand ascenders, he didn't have ascender stirrups for his feet and couldn't ascend the rope to get out and died from exhaustion.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, pinball1970, Wrichik Basu and 1 other person
jedishrfu said:
While he had hand ascenders, he didn't have ascender stirrups for his feet and couldn't ascend the rope to get out and died from exhaustion.
I saw that part of the video. Poor guy. :(
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
  • #10
anorlunda said:
I've been trying to imagine modeling the water falling in that 2000 m
Similar to a waterfall no doubt - misty, huge droplets, air entrained.

One can turn on a tap and see the flow thin out and break up into droplets due to acceleration due to gravity and surface tension.
Just put several thousand of these taps together and investigate to flow.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dlgoff

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K