Dark Energy Horizon: Light's Eternal Boundary?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the cosmic event horizon and the boundaries of light in the expanding universe. Participants explore questions regarding the distances at which light emitted from various sources will never reach an observer, as well as the implications of these distances on cosmic observations and the nature of light in an expanding space.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the boundary beyond which light will never reach us and whether light appears to stand still at this boundary.
  • One participant provides a calculation indicating that the distance at which light will never reach us is approximately 15.5 billion light years, while noting that light does not stand still at the horizon due to space expanding at the same rate as light travels.
  • Another participant references a calculator and discusses the maximum distance from which light will eventually reach us, suggesting it will be around 17.3 billion light years in the future.
  • There is a distinction made between the Hubble radius and the particle horizon, with some participants clarifying that the Hubble radius is not constant and should be considered an approximation.
  • One participant outlines two questions regarding the matter whose light will never reach us, providing specific distances for light emitted in the past and light emitted today, suggesting a cutoff of 63 billion light years for past emissions and 16.47 billion light years for current emissions.
  • There is discussion about the implications of the cosmic event horizon and how it differs from the Hubble radius, with some participants expressing confusion about how light can eventually reach us despite currently receding at the speed of light.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the distances associated with the cosmic event horizon and the Hubble radius. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the implications of these distances or the nature of light at the boundaries discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of the Hubble radius and particle horizon, as well as unresolved mathematical steps in the calculations presented. The discussion also highlights the complexity of understanding light behavior in an expanding universe.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
Where is the boundary that light will never reach us, and will light seem to stand still at this boundary
if so will there be a cosmic ring of light from some observer?
 
Space news on Phys.org
This calculator can calculate it: About 15.5 billion light years.
Light does not stand still, for light at the horizon, space expands at the same rate as light travels towards it. At the same time, the light gets redshifted due to the expansion of the universe.

Ring of what? And for which observer?
 
The link above is an older version of Jorrie's calculator the latest version is at although the latest link is included in that thread it would take a bit to find it. here is the latest version below

http://www.einsteins-theory-of-relativity-4engineers.com/LightCone7/LightCone.html

I simply selected the columns I wanted, used the text script small the value you want is at S=1.000 Dhor you can see later on that the maximum distance we will ever receive light will be in the future when Dhor equals 17.3 Gly proper distance

[tex]{\small\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline R_{0} (Gly) & R_{\infty} (Gly) & S_{eq} & H_{0} & \Omega_\Lambda & \Omega_m\\ \hline 14.4&17.3&3400&67.9&0.693&0.307\\ \hline \end{array}}[/tex] [tex]{\small\begin{array}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline a=1/S&S&T (Gy)&R (Gly)&D_{now} (Gly)&D_{then}(Gly)&D_{hor}(Gly)&D_{par}(Gly) \\ \hline 0.001&1090.000&0.0004&0.0006&45.332&0.042&0.057&0.001\\ \hline 0.003&339.773&0.0025&0.0040&44.184&0.130&0.179&0.006\\ \hline 0.009&105.913&0.0153&0.0235&42.012&0.397&0.552&0.040\\ \hline 0.030&33.015&0.0902&0.1363&38.052&1.153&1.652&0.249\\ \hline 0.097&10.291&0.5223&0.7851&30.918&3.004&4.606&1.491\\ \hline 0.312&3.208&2.9777&4.3736&18.248&5.688&10.827&8.733\\ \hline 1.000&1.000&13.7872&14.3999&0.000&0.000&16.472&46.279\\ \hline 3.208&0.312&32.8849&17.1849&11.118&35.666&17.225&184.083\\ \hline 7.580&0.132&47.7251&17.2911&14.219&107.786&17.291&458.476\\ \hline 17.911&0.056&62.5981&17.2993&15.536&278.256&17.299&1106.893\\ \hline 42.321&0.024&77.4737&17.2998&16.093&681.061&17.300&2639.026\\ \hline 100.000&0.010&92.3494&17.2999&16.328&1632.838&17.300&6259.262\\ \hline \end{array}}[/tex]
 
for light at the horizon, space expands at the same rate as light travels towards it.

This describes the Hubble radius, not the particle horizon just beyond it.
 
Particle Horizon Plot

Here is a plot of the cosmic event horizon (D_Hor), the Hubble radius (R) and the lightcone (D_then) for comparison.

attachment.php?attachmentid=59455&stc=1&d=1370970468.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Cosmic Horizon.jpg
    Cosmic Horizon.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 487
@Naty1: You are right, it is not exactly the same, as the Hubble radius is not constant. It should be a good approximation.
 
wolram said:
Where is the boundary that light will never reach us, ...?
Wooly the others (Mfb, Mordy et al) already answered, but I like your question a lot and Mordy just posted a useful table based on latest data from the ESA (euro. space. agency) Planck mission so it's hard to resist talking more about this!

There are two questions:
A. where is the matter whose light will never reach us?
B. where is the matter whose light emitted today will never reach us?

Answers:
A. The matter whose light (even light it emitted long ago near start of expansion that has already been traveling 13.7 billion years towards us!) will never reach us is now at or beyond distance 63 billion LY. The cutoff is 63 Gly. Light that set out in our direction long ago from matter that is now less than 63 Gly will eventually get here.

That is also the matter that light from OUR stuff, emitted long ago near start of expansion, will eventually reach. It works both ways. You get that number from Mordy's table by going to the a=100 row (bottom row) and looking at "particle horizon, Dpar" which is 6259 Gly and dividing by a=100.
6259 Gly what the distance to that matter will be when light from our stuff eventually gets there, and it is 100 times what the distance to that matter is now. So divide by 100 to get the distance of that matter now, something around 63 Gly.

B. The matter whose light (emitted TODAY) will never reach us is now at or beyond distance 16.47 Gly. You get that number from Mordy's table by going to the a=1 row (the present day row) and looking at "event horizon Dhor" which you see is 16.47 Gly. Let's call that 16.5 billion ly, not to be overly precise.

If TODAY a galaxy which is 16.5 Gly from us has a supernova explosion we will never see it.
But a galaxy closer than that cutoff can have an explosion today or send us a message today and we WILL eventually see it. Again, it works both ways. Closer than 16.5 are where the people are to whom we could today send a message and it would eventually get there. The people beyond 16.5 are folks we could not reach with a flash of light signal that we send off today. That's called the cosmic event horizon.

The cosmic "event horizon" is NOT THE SAME as the "Hubble radius" denoted R in the table. The current size of the Hubble radius, if you look on the a=1 row, you see is 14.4 Gly. That is the distance of light which is trying to get to us but not making any progress because it is traveling thru space which is receding at exactly c. And light that is now safely WITHIN 14.4 is making progress towards us.
You can see from Mordy's table that the Hubble radius increases over time. You can also see that from the curves plotted in Jorrie's post which I just saw.
Light which is today at Hubble radius 14.4 will EVENTUALLY make it because even though it is making no headway now the size of the Hubble radius will eventually grow to take it in, and then it will be within Hub radius and begin to close in on us. A lot of people are puzzled by this. How can light which is currently in space receding at speed c and making no progress eventually get here? You mean to say that the Hubble radius is not an horizon?
This confusion of people is very natural and something we just have to live with.

Like I said the REAL event horizon distance (as of today) is not the Hub radius of 14.4 but the one the table shows as 16.47. A photon that is today just barely within that distance, and aimed at us, will indeed be slowly losing ground and getting swept slowly back, but way in the future it will have been swept back only as far as 17.3 and just as it is almost lost ("falling over the cliff" so to speak) the Hubble radius, which has been increasing faster than the distance to the photon, will also extend out to 17.3 and take it in! Saved at that last moment! On the very brink of despair! So the REAL horizon, as of today, is 16.47

Mordred said:
The link above is an older version of Jorrie's calculator the latest version is at although the latest link is included in that thread it would take a bit to find it. here is the latest version below

http://www.einsteins-theory-of-relativity-4engineers.com/LightCone7/LightCone.html

I simply selected the columns I wanted, used the text script small the value you want is at S=1.000 Dhor you can see later on that the maximum distance we will ever receive light will be in the future when Dhor equals 17.3 Gly proper distance

[tex]{\small\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline R_{0} (Gly) & R_{\infty} (Gly) & S_{eq} & H_{0} & \Omega_\Lambda & \Omega_m\\ \hline 14.4&17.3&3400&67.9&0.693&0.307\\ \hline \end{array}}[/tex] [tex]{\small\begin{array}{|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline a=1/S&S&T (Gy)&R (Gly)&D_{now} (Gly)&D_{then}(Gly)&D_{hor}(Gly)&D_{par}(Gly) \\ \hline 0.001&1090.000&0.0004&0.0006&45.332&0.042&0.057&0.001\\ \hline 0.003&339.773&0.0025&0.0040&44.184&0.130&0.179&0.006\\ \hline 0.009&105.913&0.0153&0.0235&42.012&0.397&0.552&0.040\\ \hline 0.030&33.015&0.0902&0.1363&38.052&1.153&1.652&0.249\\ \hline 0.097&10.291&0.5223&0.7851&30.918&3.004&4.606&1.491\\ \hline 0.312&3.208&2.9777&4.3736&18.248&5.688&10.827&8.733\\ \hline 1.000&1.000&13.7872&14.3999&0.000&0.000&16.472&46.279\\ \hline 3.208&0.312&32.8849&17.1849&11.118&35.666&17.225&184.083\\ \hline 7.580&0.132&47.7251&17.2911&14.219&107.786&17.291&458.476\\ \hline 17.911&0.056&62.5981&17.2993&15.536&278.256&17.299&1106.893\\ \hline 42.321&0.024&77.4737&17.2998&16.093&681.061&17.300&2639.026\\ \hline 100.000&0.010&92.3494&17.2999&16.328&1632.838&17.300&6259.262\\ \hline \end{array}}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
One interesting consequence of all of this is that, since our current event horizon is at a redshift of about 2, a large number of the galaxies and quasars that we see in images from large telescopes are already out of reach, meaning that even if we sent them a signal today, it would never reach them. Also our event horizon will get smaller with time, meaning that the number of galaxies with which we could communicate is getting steadily smaller.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K