Dark Matter , Dark energy and the Dirac equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GaloisGroup
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the Dirac equation in relation to dark matter and dark energy, particularly focusing on the nature of vacuum energy, the conservation of energy in an expanding universe, and the role of dark energy in cosmic expansion. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding these topics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the Dirac equation indicates that vacuum space is filled with virtual particles, suggesting that even "empty space" contains energy.
  • Others express difficulty in reconciling the idea that the universe is not a closed system at large scales with the implications of dark energy, suggesting a potential energy imbalance.
  • A participant questions whether the exponential addition of energy at universal scales violates conservation laws.
  • One participant clarifies that virtual particles are not real particles but rather a calculational tool.
  • Another participant distinguishes that dark energy does not cause expansion but rather accelerates it, asserting that energy is not conserved globally in an expanding universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of dark energy and its implications for energy conservation in an expanding universe. There is no consensus on these points, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of energy conservation in cosmological contexts and the unresolved status of claims regarding dark energy and its effects on the universe's expansion.

GaloisGroup
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Does the exponential addition of added energy at universal scales violate conservation?
The Dirac equation suggest that vacuum space is really quite busy with virtual particles popping in then annihilating each other. Even “empty space” contains energy. I am having difficulty with what some folks in the physics community are saying about the universe not being a closed system at scale. Dark energy is causing the creation of more space and hence it seems there is a massive energy imbalance somewhere or, what’s more likely and is obvious; we know nothing about “dark energy” and folks are hand waving. Sorry if this question has already been addressed.
 
Space news on Phys.org
GaloisGroup said:
TL;DR Summary: Does the exponential addition of added energy at universal scales violate conservation?

The Dirac equation suggest that vacuum space is really quite busy with virtual particles popping in then annihilating each other. Even “empty space” contains energy. I am having difficulty with what some folks in the physics community are saying about the universe not being a closed system at scale. Dark energy is causing the creation of more space and hence it seems there is a massive energy imbalance somewhere or, what’s more likely and is obvious; we know nothing about “dark energy” and folks are hand waving. Sorry if this question has already been addressed.
Can you cite a scholarly reference that motivates and supports these statements?
 
GaloisGroup said:
The Dirac equation suggest that vacuum space is really quite busy with virtual particles popping in then annihilating each other.
Virtual particles, by definition, are not real particles. They are only an aid to calculation.
 
Dark energy does not cause expansion. It causes acceleration of the expansion. But a universe void of dark energy could still expand. Energy is not conserved globally in an expanding universe, whether it has dark energy or not.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42, berkeman and javisot

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K