Graduate David Bohm's Paper on Hidden Variables Theory

Click For Summary
David Bohm's paper on hidden variables theory presents a complex function ψ in terms of real functions R and S, which are essential for understanding his interpretation of quantum mechanics. The discussion focuses on the challenge of deriving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation (TISE) from these functions, specifically through the use of the chain rule for differentiation. The confusion arises when trying to simplify the resulting expressions to match Bohm's equations, indicating a potential need for additional algebraic manipulation or identities. It is noted that multiplying the expression by ψ* reveals both real and imaginary components, suggesting that the complex TISE can be separated into two distinct equations. This separation leads to a clearer understanding of the dynamics described in Bohm's framework.
The_Inventor
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
So I've been reading David Bohm's original paper on the alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of hidden variables, just out of interest. In the 4th section he presents a complex function ψ in terms of R and S, and then (using the time dependent schrodinger equation, TISE) gives the partial derivatives of R and S with respect to time. My problem is I can't seem to work out how he did it. The thing I did was to use the chain rule and to take the derivative of ψ with respect to R and S, and then multiply those with the derivatives of R and S with respect to time, respectively. However, from there I got lost because after plugging these back into the TISE, I couldn't seem to simplify the relation to resemble the one in the paper, perhaps there is some laplacian identity that I'm unaware of, or some algebraic manipulation that I can't see. Can anyone help me out??

(I have linked the original paper to this post for reference, page 4 is what my question is on.)
http://fma.if.usp.br/~amsilva/Artigos/p166_1.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The functions ##R## and ##S## are useful because they are real (not complex like ##\Psi##). So when you plug everything back to the TDSE, and multiply the whole expression with ##\Psi^*## to remove the common phase factor ##e^{iS/\hbar}##, you should observe that the resulting equation has two kinds of terms. The ones that are purely real, and the ones that are purely imaginary. This means that the complex TDSE is really two equations, one for the real part and another for the imaginary part. Write down those two equations separately and you should obtain (3) and (4).
 
Last edited:
These papers by Pegg et al. (doi: 10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.02.003 [section 4]; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/230928426_Retrodiction_in_quantum_optics [section 3.2]) seem to show that photon Bell correlations can be inferred using quantum theory in a manner that is compatible with locality by performing quantum retrodiction (i.e. inferring information about the past: e.g. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040586; more papers at end) where they evolve backward from Alice's measured outcome...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 292 ·
10
Replies
292
Views
12K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
7K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
22K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 122 ·
5
Replies
122
Views
10K